Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 4/01/2025 10:46 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:On a sunny day (Sat, 4 Jan 2025 11:24:13 +0000) it happened Martin Brown>
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote in <vlb5ou$efa1$1@dont-email.me>:
On 04/01/2025 08:06, Jan Panteltje wrote:Elon Musk: “We’re going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction.”>
What to make of Musk's comments that are critical of NASA's lunar plans?
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/01/elon-musk-were-going-straight-to-mars-the-moon-is-a-distraction/
He's already on a different planet!
>
By all means send him to Mars (one way ticket) and good riddance!
Na. I like it
A Mars landing will improve the standing of the US too.
And it may confirm life there (sample return possible too).
It might, but probably won't.
>and confirm the Viking positive experiment:>
http://www.gillevin.com/
It wasn't exactly positive.
>Else...>
China will land on Mars and claim all of it and find life there.
:-)
Why would they bother?
So many money sucking NahSah projects, driving around the block doing acrobatics>
going nowhere.
If Columbus had been that way the Aztecs would still rule :-)
Columbus didn't expect to discover America - he though the earth was
smaller than Eratosthenes had worked it out to around 300BC and that
he'd get to China. Most people at time correctly though that he was nuts.
>I remember those Moon landings, was at the National TV network control room>
relaying it to the country here.
It united much of humanity, very inspiring.
Now US cannot even go there it seems.
It was an expensive stunt, very attention-getting at the time - I
watched it while I was doing the final tidying up on my Ph.D. thesis.
>
The US is working on going back there, but with rather more emphasis on
finding out useful information.
>Hope Musk makes it while I am still around.>
He's too busy cultivating Donald Trump to bother.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.