Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 05. Jan 2025, 21:34:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <9pqlnjdvp9mtmm237h9q7ju79hj4oe0qq5@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:37:08 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 05 Jan 2025 09:53:24 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 11:18:16 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
 
On 1/5/2025 11:01 AM, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:45:19 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
 
On 1/4/2025 5:04 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:33:10 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 1/4/2025 12:20 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 11:30:07 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net>
wrote:
>
On 1/4/2025 11:09 AM, john larkin wrote:
>
Fox News et al. generates a whole variety of fatuous nonsense
and they see what gets clicks and eyeballs and what doesn't,
throw shit at the wall and see what sticks.
>
Then they feed the most highly-rated nonsense to
Trump/Musk/Vance et al who bring it up in their next speech or
X post and the hoi polloi are like "Wow, they know what's on
our minds. they really understand us!"
>
>
You sneer at the people who keep you alive. Maybe they shouldn't
bother.
>
PS: I can do my own tech support, plumbing, and car repair, and
the overwhelming majority of Americans aren't farmers. And robots
and migrant labor don't vote.
>
Do you generate your own electricity, pump your own water, kill
your own chickens, do your own surgery and nursing, chop your own
wood to heat your house?
>
Keep bees for wax and honey? We did that.
>
>
>
Are we operating under the premise that there are only
conservatives in the service industry sector, and the trades?
>
I don't have much further to add to this (somewhat confusing)
scenario if that's the case because I reject the premise as being
silly. There are no leftists in medicine or nursing, now?
>
I didn't start studying electronics seriously until my late 20s,
and didn't make any money at it for years after that. I've had lots
of jobs over the years, washing dishes, delivering papers, stocking
shelves, tech support, sales, senior care-giving..
>
Not sure what grudge you think I have against the "working class",
I _am_ the working class!
>
But are you a hoi polloi ?
>
>
Deplorable is is deplorable does, man. What am I supposed to tell
people who think violent crime "is way up" when it's been going down
for 50 years and that children are regularly getting sex changes, or
whatever nonsense some significant fraction of citizens choose to
believe today. "Yeah, you're right?"
>
Plenty of very well-to-do people seem to believe the same nonsense,
so it's not really a class-thing.
 
You invent people as targets for your need for contempt. You would
have been an ardent Nazi in the 1930's Germany. Tribal.
 
 
 
also: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law>
 
Makes sense. Nazi-ism was a tribal/racial-purity movement that killed
maybe 100 million people and is damaging the world still.
 
Nazi Germany tolerated no dissent, like China, Russia, Cuba, North
Korea, Iran today.
 
None do notable electronic design. The Enlightment was good for
electronic design, kick started free thinking.
>
To be fair, the Nazis did come up with some truly outstanding science in
the field of warfare, despite the absence of totally free thinking in most
other areas. Likewise, Russia has achieved wonders with its hypersonic
missile program. So creativity can still flourish, even under the most
totalitarian regimes, it seems. (Just a shame it's all for the wrong
purposes!)

What's the big deal about hypersonic missiles? We already have ICBMs,
which are much faster and harder to intercept.

The real revolution is warfare is millions of cheap expendable drones,
small ones on the battlefield and fighter drones in the air. We could
have a war where nobody gets hurt.

Let the russkies spend billions on hypersonics... less to spend on
things that work.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jan 25 * OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"62Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Carlos E.R.
2 Jan 25 +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"56Sylvia Else
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"44Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"43bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"40john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"34bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"31john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"30bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"29john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"24bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"22john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"13bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"12john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"8bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
8 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
3 Jan 25 ii`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
3 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"5Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii   `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii    `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
4 Jan 25 i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
3 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal