Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 06. Jan 2025, 06:09:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlfohs$1f36j$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/01/2025 5:37 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jan 2025 09:53:24 -0800, john larkin wrote:
 
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 11:18:16 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 1/5/2025 11:01 AM, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:45:19 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 1/4/2025 5:04 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:33:10 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 1/4/2025 12:20 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 11:30:07 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net>
wrote:
>
On 1/4/2025 11:09 AM, john larkin wrote:
<snip>

You invent people as targets for your need for contempt. You would
have been an ardent Nazi in the 1930's Germany. Tribal.
>
>
>
also: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law>
>
Makes sense. Nazi-ism was a tribal/racial-purity movement that killed
maybe 100 million people and is damaging the world still.
>
Nazi Germany tolerated no dissent, like China, Russia, Cuba, North
Korea, Iran today.
>
None do notable electronic design. The Enlightment was good for
electronic design, kick started free thinking.
 To be fair, the Nazis did come up with some truly outstanding science in
the field of warfare, despite the absence of totally free thinking in most
other areas.
They did shoot themselves in the foot with their disdain for "Jewish science". Lise Meitner essentially discovered nuclear fission, but only she'd had to get out of Germany to evade the Nazi's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lise_Meitner

Likewise, Russia has achieved wonders with its hypersonic
missile program. So creativity can still flourish, even under the most
totalitarian regimes, it seems. (Just a shame it's all for the wrong
purposes!).
It doesn't exactly flourish. It can survive, but totalitarians make a lot of bad choices - Lysenko comes to mind. Elon Musk is likely to provide more examples.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jan 25 * OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"62Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
1 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Carlos E.R.
2 Jan 25 +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"56Sylvia Else
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"44Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"43bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"40john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"34bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"31john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"30bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"29john larkin
4 Jan 25 ii  ii  +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"24bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"22john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"13bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"12john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"8bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4bitrex
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3john larkin
7 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
8 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6john larkin
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i +* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i+- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1john larkin
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i i`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i i  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Liz Tuddenham
6 Jan 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"4Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
5 Jan 25 ii  ii   `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
6 Jan 25 ii  i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
3 Jan 25 ii`- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"7john larkin
3 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"6Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"5Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 ii  +- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii  `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"3bitrex
4 Jan 25 ii   `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2Cursitor Doom
4 Jan 25 ii    `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
3 Jan 25 i`* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
4 Jan 25 i `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman
2 Jan 25 `* Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"2john larkin
3 Jan 25  `- Re: OT: "We're not treating this as a terrorist attack"1Bill Sloman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal