Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars
De : cd999666 (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 06. Jan 2025, 23:29:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlhlgb$1r0lh$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 07:59:26 -0800, john larkin wrote:

On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 06:30:05 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
 
On a sunny day (Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:52:12 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vldkof$vf47$2@dont-email.me>:
>
On 5/01/2025 7:40 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sun, 5 Jan 2025 06:12:18 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote in
<vld7s2$3c22c$4@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org>:
 
On 2025-01-04, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
Elon Musk: “We’re going straight to Mars. The Moon is a
distraction.�
What to make of Musk's comments that are critical of NASA's lunar
plans?
  https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/01/elon-musk-were-going-
straight-to-mars-the-moon-is-a-distraction/
>
Musk seems promising, but he has a history of not delivering.
 
SpaceX, Tesla, X, Startlink...
>
What Musk did to Twitter while he was renaming "X" didn't add to it's
value.
>
"The Washington Post reported that the company had lost $24 billion in
equity value, "a vaporization of wealth that has little parallel
outside the realm of economic or industry-specific crashes, or
devastating corporate scandals.""
>
It depends, I was thinking the same thing when he took over the thing
>
But now speculations go that it may merge with Truth-Social (Trump's
platform)
https://fortune.com/2024/11/14/trump-musk-social-media-truth-social-x-
alliance/
and that gives him all Republican advertisers begging to use it.
That is half or more of America.
We will see where it goes!
>
SpaceX also went almost bankrupt testing, and look now...
 
The Silicon Valley mantra is "fail fast, fail often."

..."leave a good-looking corpse."

You missed that last bit out. ;-)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jan 25 * OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars16Jan Panteltje
4 Jan 25 +* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars6Martin Brown
4 Jan 25 i+* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars4Jan Panteltje
4 Jan 25 ii`* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars3Bill Sloman
5 Jan 25 ii `* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars2Jan Panteltje
5 Jan 25 ii  `- Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars1Bill Sloman
4 Jan 25 i`- Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars1Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25 `* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars9Jan Panteltje
5 Jan 25  +* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars4Bill Sloman
6 Jan 25  i`* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars3Jan Panteltje
6 Jan 25  i `* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars2john larkin
6 Jan 25  i  `- Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars1Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25  `* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars4john larkin
5 Jan 25   +* Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars2Cursitor Doom
5 Jan 25   i`- Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars1john larkin
6 Jan 25   `- Re: OT?: Musk: We are going straight to Mars1Jan Panteltje

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal