Sujet : Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 11. Jan 2025, 22:52:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uao5ojpreakkhjf8ggumt3nilqeoo9k752@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:04:16 +0000, Jeff Layman <
Jeff@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On 11/01/2025 13:11, Bill Sloman wrote:
On 11/01/2025 7:29 pm, Jeff Layman wrote:
On 11/01/2025 04:17, Bill Sloman wrote:
>
Everything I've read about fusion power states that to start it an
immense amount of power is required.
Then you haven't read much. Cold fusion wouldn't take much power at all,
if it worked.
>
Is that the best you can do? You'll get a reputation for trolling, or
perhaps you've got a signed picture of Fleischmann and Pons on your wall.
Cold Fusion is mostly bad calorimetry.
But really, Sloman has declared you to be ignorant, so back off and
beg forgiveness.
US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February
Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February