Sujet : Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 12. Jan 2025, 03:35:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlv9qa$s9hc$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/01/2025 8:52 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 21:04:16 +0000, Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
On 11/01/2025 13:11, Bill Sloman wrote:
On 11/01/2025 7:29 pm, Jeff Layman wrote:
On 11/01/2025 04:17, Bill Sloman wrote:
>
Everything I've read about fusion power states that to start it an
immense amount of power is required.
>
Then you haven't read much. Cold fusion wouldn't take much power at all,
if it worked.
>
Is that the best you can do? You'll get a reputation for trolling, or
perhaps you've got a signed picture of Fleischmann and Pons on your wall.
Cold Fusion is mostly bad calorimetry.
But really, Sloman has declared you to be ignorant, so back off and
beg forgiveness.
John Larkin really is ignorant, and I call him on it a lot, and he resents it (he should try to get less ignorant, but vanity prevents him from recognising how ignorant he is).
I was twitting Jeff Layman for being less precise than he might have been - he clearly isn't ignorant - but John Larkin has once again projected his own resentment.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February
Re: US Intuitive Machines set for second moon landing in February