Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 16. Jan 2025, 08:45:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmadei$3dim0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16/01/2025 2:41 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vm9tod$37i55$1@dont-email.me...
On 16/01/2025 7:23 am, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote in message news:20250115a@crcomp.net...
Edward Rawde wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
This just reworks my circuit to use a controllable asymmetric current mirror instead of the FET for gain control. I take the
feedback from the full wave rectifier and switch every half-cycle to reconstruct a variable amplitude sine wave to control the
output amplitude. It does use a lot of components, but it strikes me as fairly comprehensible.
>
>
First I corrected the usual line wrap issues.
>
In the latest LTSpice (24.1.0) it took me a good hour or two to find out why I was getting strange netlist errors for all the
opamps
in the circuit.
>
This turned out to be .ENDS in the BAS70L model. Remove .ENDS and the issues go away.
>
So this is the circuit I'm simulating in 24.1.0 with no component updates available.
I'm expecting it to take 2 hours to complete.
>
Thank you for your tip to wait 2 hours for results. For what it's worth,
Bill's original LTSpice source worked for me "as is."
>
It did for me too, but because it looked like simulation time would be long I moved it to another machine I use over remote
desktop.
On that machine LTSpice asked if I'd like the latest version so I upgraded to 24.1.0.
After the upgrade I got very strange netlist errors which didn't mention BAS70L and it took a while to figure out the cause.
>
I'm now revising the simulation time to a minimum of 4 days for 10 seconds.
24.1.0 seems to be faster.
>
My computer seems to be faster. It mostly simulates at about 25msec/sec for me so I get my 10 seconds in about seven minutes of
real time. There are spots early in the process where it slows down, but not for long.
 The Lenovo core i7 3.6GHz with SSD I'm running it on hasn't gone above 30us/s.
If your computer is 1000 times faster I'd like to have one, otherwise there's another explanation somewhere.
My computer uses an i5-3470 CPU running at 3.20GHz. It's more than ten years old. LTSpice uses my SSD card which isn't original, so your hardware ought to be even faster.
<snip>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jan 25 * Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator31Bill Sloman
15 Jan 25 +* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator12Edward Rawde
15 Jan 25 i+* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2Edward Rawde
15 Jan 25 ii`- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde
15 Jan 25 i`* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator9Don
15 Jan 25 i `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator8Edward Rawde
16 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator7Bill Sloman
16 Jan 25 i   +* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator3Edward Rawde
16 Jan 25 i   i`* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2Bill Sloman
16 Jan 25 i   i `- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde
16 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator3Edward Rawde
16 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2Bill Sloman
16 Jan 25 i     `- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde
20 Jan 25 `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator18Bill Sloman
20 Jan 25  +* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2Edward Rawde
20 Jan 25  i`- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde
21 Jan 25  `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator15Bill Sloman
21 Jan 25   `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator14Edward Rawde
21 Jan 25    `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator13Edward Rawde
21 Jan 25     +* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator6john larkin
21 Jan 25     i`* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator5Edward Rawde
21 Jan 25     i +* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2john larkin
22 Jan 25     i i`- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Bill Sloman
21 Jan 25     i `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2JM
22 Jan 25     i  `- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde
22 Jan 25     `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator6Bill Sloman
22 Jan 25      +- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde
22 Jan 25      `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator4Bill Sloman
23 Jan 25       `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator3Edward Rawde
23 Jan 25        `* Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator2Bill Sloman
23 Jan 25         `- Re: Current mirror version of the lowish distortion 1kHz sine wave osillator1Edward Rawde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal