Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 16. Jan 2025, 17:03:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmbajs$3idpo$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 1/16/2025 8:10 AM, brian wrote:
In message <vm69a2$2h52d$1@dont-email.me>, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> writes
I am surprised (disturbed?) at the problems people seem to have
sorting these things out in their thought processes.  I don't
*believe* people think strictly "serially" but I am beginning to
question that belief as I witness smart/capable people stuck in
that mindset!
 It's simple project engineering and resource management . PERT , Critical path analysis, lead times , Gantt charts, even Microsoft Project if you must. You must be talking to non-engineers.
Different class of activities, entirely.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jan 25 * Serial, concurrent, parallel35Don Y
14 Jan 25 +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel9Liz Tuddenham
14 Jan 25 i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel8Don Y
14 Jan 25 i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel7Liz Tuddenham
15 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel6Don Y
16 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Don Y
16 Jan 25 i     `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i      +- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i      `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1ehsjr
16 Jan 25 +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel20Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel19Don Y
16 Jan 25 i +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel16Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i i+* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel13Don Y
16 Jan 25 i ii`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel12Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i ii +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Liz Tuddenham
17 Jan 25 i ii i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i  +- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i ii `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel6Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii  `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii   `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii    `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii     `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii      `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i i `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5brian
16 Jan 25  +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3john larkin
17 Jan 25  i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2brian
17 Jan 25  i `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1john larkin
16 Jan 25  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal