Sujet : Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 17. Jan 2025, 21:04:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmed40$6qm7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 1/17/2025 5:19 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vmctge$3u72f$1@dont-email.me...
On 1/16/2025 9:22 PM, Edward Rawde wrote:
"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vmc36h$3mt5f$1@dont-email.me...
On 1/16/2025 10:57 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
Databases can also be backed up as human readable text files.
>
To be fair, a spreadsheet's contents can similarly be exported (CSV).
I'm not sure how the formulae, formats, etc. are handled, though.
And, any non-text entries (that might be supported).
>
In other words exporting a database as SQL is not in any way similar to exporting a spreadsheet as csv.
>
Of course it is. The difference lies in WHAT you are exporting.
What does a 3MB photo (stored as a BLOB) look like when exported in SQL?
Is it any more recognizable in that form?
You may as well ask what it looks like when a jpg is opened in a text editor.
You touted the fact that YOU can see your data as human readable files
(in the event <something> happens to the database software). That
this is an asset that DBMSs have over spreadsheets.
My point is that this only partially works as you expect.
A spreadsheet's contents can be exported as <whatever>-delimited
form which will make the same sorts of data that are readable when
exported in an SQL dump "readable", readable.
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
14 Jan 25 | Serial, concurrent, parallel | 35 | | Don Y |
14 Jan 25 |  Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 9 | | Liz Tuddenham |
14 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 8 | | Don Y |
14 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 7 | | Liz Tuddenham |
15 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 6 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |      Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |       Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 4 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |        Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | ehsjr |
16 Jan 25 |  Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 20 | | Martin Brown |
16 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 19 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 16 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 13 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |      Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 12 | | Liz Tuddenham |
16 Jan 25 |       Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |        Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 4 | | Liz Tuddenham |
17 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |          Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |          Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |       Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 6 | | Edward Rawde |
17 Jan 25 |        Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |         Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 4 | | Edward Rawde |
17 Jan 25 |          Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | Don Y |
17 Jan 25 |           Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | Edward Rawde |
17 Jan 25 |            Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | Martin Brown |
16 Jan 25 |      Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | Martin Brown |
16 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |
16 Jan 25 |  Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 5 | | brian |
16 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 3 | | john larkin |
17 Jan 25 |    Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 2 | | brian |
17 Jan 25 |     Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | john larkin |
16 Jan 25 |   Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel | 1 | | Don Y |