Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 17. Jan 2025, 21:59:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmegbo$7evu$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 1/17/2025 1:50 PM, Don Y wrote:
It will also ensure that multistep operations all happen
as an indivisible (atomic) "transaction" so no other
user (accessing the database at that same instant)
will ever see "partial results".  E.g., adjusting the
population of locality 5 down by 321 souls to reflect the
folks who have RELOCATED to locality 88 (you will never
see 321 *extra* people nor 88 *fewer* people, depending
s/88/321/

on the order in which the *individual* population counts
were "adjusted".)
I.e., I can:
    adjust the population of locality 5 down by 321
    THEN, adjust the poulation of locality 88 *up* by 321
OR
    adjust the population of locality 88 up by 321
    THEN, adjust the population of locality 5 down by 321
If <someone> peeks at this data between the first "step"
and the second, they will either see 321 fewer people
living in the country (!) or 321 *more* -- when the
total population hasn't actually changed (as is evident
before and after the "transaction")

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jan 25 * Serial, concurrent, parallel35Don Y
14 Jan 25 +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel9Liz Tuddenham
14 Jan 25 i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel8Don Y
14 Jan 25 i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel7Liz Tuddenham
15 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel6Don Y
16 Jan 25 i   `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i    `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Don Y
16 Jan 25 i     `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i      +- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i      `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1ehsjr
16 Jan 25 +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel20Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel19Don Y
16 Jan 25 i +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel16Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i i+* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel13Don Y
16 Jan 25 i ii`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel12Liz Tuddenham
16 Jan 25 i ii +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Liz Tuddenham
17 Jan 25 i ii i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i  +- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii i  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i ii `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel6Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii  `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii   `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel4Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii    `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3Don Y
17 Jan 25 i ii     `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Edward Rawde
17 Jan 25 i ii      `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i i `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 i `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2Martin Brown
16 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y
16 Jan 25 `* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel5brian
16 Jan 25  +* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel3john larkin
17 Jan 25  i`* Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel2brian
17 Jan 25  i `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1john larkin
16 Jan 25  `- Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal