Re: battery fire

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: battery fire
De : '''newspam''' (at) *nospam* nonad.co.uk (Martin Brown)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Jan 2025, 10:10:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vml3tc$30r7j$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 19/01/2025 15:24, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 1/19/25 14:09, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 10:38:17 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:

 From direct experience, I know it is quite stable in dry air.
It tarnishes in seconds in air with normal humidity levels,
and yes, it reacts violently with water.
>
Depends. Yes, violently if confined, but merely vigorously if allowed
to skate around on the surface expelling energy.
 Have you actually seen it?
Yes. Lithium is quite tame compared to any of the other alkali metals which invariably self ignite with really rather small fragments.
There is a lithium metal battery with potentially an order of magnitude higher energy density than current Lithium ion batteries but it is proving hard to tame. Has a nasty habit of forming dendrites and shorting itself out internally with all the usual problems...
They may yet perfect it as a technology.

I have. (It was thick foil, not a lump, and it was not confined.)
 Violent is the word that's fitting.
I'd go for vigorous. It melts fairly easily, floats and doesn't self ignite unless there is quite a decent chunk of it - more than pea sized.
Sodium is violent, melts and is self igniting at about pea size.
Potassium is close to explosive so best done with a very small piece.
Rubidium is explosively fast and memorable even for a tiny shard.
--
Martin Brown

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jan 25 * battery fire41john larkin
17 Jan 25 +* Re: battery fire10Cursitor Doom
17 Jan 25 i+- Re: battery fire1john larkin
17 Jan 25 i`* Re: battery fire8Jeroen Belleman
17 Jan 25 i +- Re: battery fire1Phil Hobbs
17 Jan 25 i +* Re: battery fire5john larkin
17 Jan 25 i i+- Re: battery fire1Jeroen Belleman
17 Jan 25 i i+* Re: battery fire2Cursitor Doom
18 Jan 25 i ii`- Re: battery fire1Bill Sloman
18 Jan 25 i i`- Re: battery fire1Bill Sloman
18 Jan 25 i `- Re: battery fire1Liz Tuddenham
17 Jan 25 `* Re: battery fire30Martin Brown
17 Jan 25  +* Re: battery fire3Jeroen Belleman
18 Jan 25  i+- Re: battery fire1Bill Sloman
19 Jan 25  i`- Re: battery fire1Martin Brown
18 Jan 25  `* Re: battery fire26Jeff Layman
18 Jan 25   +* Re: battery fire23Liz Tuddenham
18 Jan 25   i+* Re: battery fire2Jeff Layman
27 Jan 25   ii`- Re: battery fire1albert
19 Jan 25   i+- Re: battery fire1Bill Sloman
19 Jan 25   i`* Re: battery fire19Bill Sloman
19 Jan 25   i +* Re: battery fire17Sergey Kubushyn
19 Jan 25   i i+* Re: battery fire3Bill Sloman
19 Jan 25   i ii`* Re: battery fire2Liz Tuddenham
20 Jan 25   i ii `- Re: battery fire1Bill Sloman
19 Jan 25   i i+- Re: battery fire1Jeff Layman
19 Jan 25   i i`* Re: battery fire12Jeroen Belleman
19 Jan 25   i i `* Re: battery fire11Cursitor Doom
19 Jan 25   i i  +* Re: battery fire8Jeroen Belleman
19 Jan 25   i i  i+* Re: battery fire3Jeff Layman
19 Jan 25   i i  ii`* Re: battery fire2Jeroen Belleman
20 Jan 25   i i  ii `- Re: battery fire1Jeff Layman
19 Jan 25   i i  i+* Re: battery fire2Cursitor Doom
19 Jan 25   i i  ii`- Re: battery fire1Jeroen Belleman
20 Jan 25   i i  i+- Re: battery fire1Martin Brown
27 Jan 25   i i  i`- Re: battery fire1albert
19 Jan 25   i i  `* Re: battery fire2Liz Tuddenham
19 Jan 25   i i   `- Re: battery fire1Cursitor Doom
19 Jan 25   i `- Re: battery fire1Martin Brown
18 Jan 25   `* Re: battery fire2john larkin
18 Jan 25    `- Re: battery fire1Cursitor Doom

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal