Re: OT: Typical Globlist

On 20/01/2025 5:01 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:17:12 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
 

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:10:58 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:49:31 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>
[...]

The proposition that radiant heat generated by one burning would set off
an adjacent house is pretty dumb. Fire codes are written to make sure
that houses aren't vulnerable in that way.

>
In that case, what spread the fire?

>
Airborne embers I would guess.

>
That shouldn't be allowed to happen, but the breeze was offshore when
that seaside strip burned.

 Are the Santa Annas always offshore? I mean as in *invariably*
offshore?
 

Sloman snipped my link of course. He does that when reality interferes
with his theories.

 Just another good reason not to waste time trying to argue with him.
Aren't you happier now you don't interract with the damn fool any
more? It was a good idea, that deal we did, I reckon.

If you like living inside a mutual admiration society and approving each other's fatuous, but ever-so-emotionally-satisfying nonsense.

There's a forestry department that inspects every property and issues
periodic reports too.
>
Humans have known about fire for dozens of years by now.

 Indeed! It would appear the building codes badly need updating to take
the natural, cyclical climate change which is taking place into
account.

We didn't get to find out about the natural cyclical variation until anthropogenic global warming made looking carefully at the climate a matter of urgency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_multidecadal_oscillation
That particular cyclic variation wasn't even named until 2000, when it was labelled by Michael Mann of hockey-stick fame.
The unnatural anthropogenic global warming the Cursitor Doom and John Larkin are foolishly skeptical about is an even bigger menace, but they prefer to ignore it.
--
Bil Sloman, Sydney