Sujet : Re: OT: Typical Globlist
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 20. Jan 2025, 15:39:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmln6b$364is$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 20/01/2025 9:44 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 10:45:07 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:01:17 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:17:12 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:10:58 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:49:31 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
<snip>
Sloman snipped my link of course. He does that when reality interferes
with his theories.
>
Just another good reason not to waste time trying to argue with him.
Aren't you happier now you don't interract with the damn fool any
more? It was a good idea, that deal we did, I reckon.
>
I might respond if he said something interesting and intelligent about
electronic design, which is highly improbable.
Bad idea. He'll start throwing in barbs and before you know it, you've
been hooked and sucked in again. Old Bill's a master angler!
But you don't catch John Larkin with posts about circuit design. He is only interested in the circuits he has slung together himself.
Cursitor Doom doesn't have a clue about that, because he doesn't follow that kind of thread.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
OT: Typical Globlist
Re: OT: Typical Globlist