Re: OT: Typical Globlist

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:52:18 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:45:34 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:18:15 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:36:08 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>

On 1/19/2025 4:49 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
 
[...]

The proposition that radiant heat generated by one burning would set off
an adjacent house is pretty dumb. Fire codes are written to make sure
that houses aren't vulnerable in that way.

 
In that case, what spread the fire?
 
 

>
Embers can fly up to 20 km depending on fuel and weather conditions, and
during high winds fire breaks are useless.
>
Observe embers from this doorbell cam:
<https://www.instagram.com/abc7marccr/reel/DEny6FGSX1f/>

>
Those little sparks should not set houses on fire.
>

>
I don't doubt embers could have spread the original fires. What's
puzzling is how the hell could they have got massive and out of
control in the first place.

>
No puzzle: dry wind and lots of fuel.

>
In that picture you posted, there were substantial patches of unharmed
vegitation right among the ashes of countless buildings. It doesn't
make sense.

It's simple. The most flammible, and the hottest burning, and the
closest things, were other houses.

I wonder if they will rebuild the same way.