Sujet : Re: OT: Typical Globlist
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 20. Jan 2025, 17:08:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmlsef$38b6c$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 21/01/2025 2:47 am, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:52:18 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:45:34 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:18:15 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:36:08 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 1/19/2025 4:49 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
<snip>
No puzzle: dry wind and lots of fuel.
>
In that picture you posted, there were substantial patches of unharmed
vegetation right among the ashes of countless buildings. It doesn't
make sense.
It's simple. The most flammible, and the hottest burning, and the
closest things, were other houses.
It's probably not quite that simple. The fires started on a very windy day, and got big, which generated even more air circulation. There are eddies - vortices - in that circulation, and you do get tongues of flame that can burn something down-wind while skipping an adjacent area
I wonder if they will rebuild the same way.
They will want their houses to look much the same as they used to, which does constrain the architects, and have the same impressive views.
People with enough money to build that sort of house aren't good at taking inconvenient advice, any more than Trump was about taking advice on how to avoid getting Covid-19.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
OT: Typical Globlist
Re: OT: Typical Globlist