Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 21/01/2025 2:47 am, john larkin wrote:Maybe not, the US has a lot of "trickle down" housing, development in much of Altadena had been banned for decades due to the threat of fire.On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:52:18 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com><snip>
wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:45:34 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:18:15 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 16:36:08 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>On 1/19/2025 4:49 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
It's probably not quite that simple. The fires started on a very windy day, and got big, which generated even more air circulation. There are eddies - vortices - in that circulation, and you do get tongues of flame that can burn something down-wind while skipping an adjacent area>No puzzle: dry wind and lots of fuel.>
In that picture you posted, there were substantial patches of unharmed
vegetation right among the ashes of countless buildings. It doesn't
make sense.
It's simple. The most flammible, and the hottest burning, and the
closest things, were other houses.
I wonder if they will rebuild the same way.They will want their houses to look much the same as they used to, which does constrain the architects, and have the same impressive views.
People with enough money to build that sort of house aren't good at taking inconvenient advice, any more than Trump was about taking advice on how to avoid getting Covid-19.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.