Re: BAW

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: BAW
De : buzz_mccool (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Buzz McCool)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 22. Jan 2025, 00:52:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmpbv6$fvb8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/21/2025 10:56 AM, john larkin wrote:
 This has got to crush the XO business. It looks like it's a single
chip that's encapsulated like any other IC. XOs are complex and need
hermetic cans.
 
Looking through this BAW app note
https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snaa362/snaa362.pdf, I couldn't tell BAW devices would work at high altitude or in a vacuum. I have to ask because the "acoustic" in the name makes me want to make sure that some sort of atmosphere isn't needed.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Jan 25 * BAW27john larkin
20 Jan 25 +* Re: BAW16Phil Hobbs
21 Jan 25 i`* Re: BAW15john larkin
22 Jan 25 i +- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: BAW13Cursitor Doom
22 Jan 25 i  `* Re: BAW12john larkin
23 Jan 25 i   `* Re: BAW11Cursitor Doom
23 Jan 25 i    `* Re: BAW10john larkin
25 Jan 25 i     `* Re: BAW9Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i      `* Re: BAW8john larkin
25 Jan 25 i       `* Re: BAW7Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i        `* Re: BAW6john larkin
25 Jan 25 i         +- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i         `* Re: BAW4Cursitor Doom
26 Jan 25 i          `* Re: BAW3john larkin
26 Jan 25 i           `* Re: BAW2Phil Hobbs
26 Jan 25 i            `- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
20 Jan 25 `* Re: BAW10John R Walliker
21 Jan 25  `* Re: BAW9john larkin
21 Jan 25   `* Re: BAW8john larkin
22 Jan 25    `* Re: BAW7Buzz McCool
22 Jan 25     `* Re: BAW6Bill Sloman
22 Jan 25      `* Re: BAW5John R Walliker
22 Jan 25       `* Re: BAW4Jeroen Belleman
22 Jan 25        +- Re: BAW1john larkin
22 Jan 25        `* Re: BAW2John R Walliker
25 Jan 25         `- Re: BAW1John R Walliker

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal