Re: BAW

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: BAW
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 23. Jan 2025, 02:09:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <te53pjpgt8gifkbq11n4teqptqar188gn7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:55:25 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:55:39 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:07:06 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:26:10 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:52:03 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
https://www.ti.com/product/CDC6C
 
These are like 35 cents at 1K.
 
 
>
Of course a crystal oscillator is a BAW device too. ;)
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
>
Don't get technical with me!
>
I wonder if it's all silicon, a sort of bulk MEMS thing. The price is
absurd. I guess every one has to be trimmed to frequency.
>
Phil's pretty good in that regard. There are some people who see
everything in terms of equations and use higher mathematics to explain
their function. A xtal oscillator would provide a very simple example
for such persons to exhibit this (most unfortunate) character trait.
>
Phil is one of those people who can see equations in motion. I can't.
I operate on instinct and simulation.
>
We have brainstormed on some pretty important projects and generated
some ideas that influence most everyone here. The skills are
complementary.
>
His book is good to have if you design electro-optics or low-level
analog stuff.
>
https://www.amazon.com/Building-Electro-Optical-Systems-Making-Applied/dp/1119438977/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?crid=3M9PG1T68443R&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.xIlGO_AWviZZRYMlHFKJuNzKnLc8MDBpUjgE7RsYsDk.WiFCuc8GjBlGtPimMCFx0kOu5NieBv0TzXDNCokyLQM&dib_tag=se&keywords=phil+hobbs+optics&qid=1737571796&s=books&sprefix=phil+hobbs+optics%2Cstripbooks%2C138&sr=1-1-fkmr0
>
Be cautioned that there are equations.
>
Equations are fine (unavoidable anyway) in this science. But it's not
helpful in the first instance to gain an intuitive idea of how
something works - unless you're one of the people I mentioned above.
This is my main issue with Tom Lee's otherwise superb book, 'Planar
Microwave Engineering' where he typically launches into higher
mathematics almost from the get-go.

I have that book. It's mostly useless. One equation will be a full
page of fine print, and then the next page turns out to be one term of
that equation.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Jan 25 * BAW27john larkin
20 Jan 25 +* Re: BAW16Phil Hobbs
21 Jan 25 i`* Re: BAW15john larkin
22 Jan 25 i +- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: BAW13Cursitor Doom
22 Jan 25 i  `* Re: BAW12john larkin
23 Jan 25 i   `* Re: BAW11Cursitor Doom
23 Jan 25 i    `* Re: BAW10john larkin
25 Jan 25 i     `* Re: BAW9Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i      `* Re: BAW8john larkin
25 Jan 25 i       `* Re: BAW7Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i        `* Re: BAW6john larkin
25 Jan 25 i         +- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i         `* Re: BAW4Cursitor Doom
26 Jan 25 i          `* Re: BAW3john larkin
26 Jan 25 i           `* Re: BAW2Phil Hobbs
26 Jan 25 i            `- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
20 Jan 25 `* Re: BAW10John R Walliker
21 Jan 25  `* Re: BAW9john larkin
21 Jan 25   `* Re: BAW8john larkin
22 Jan 25    `* Re: BAW7Buzz McCool
22 Jan 25     `* Re: BAW6Bill Sloman
22 Jan 25      `* Re: BAW5John R Walliker
22 Jan 25       `* Re: BAW4Jeroen Belleman
22 Jan 25        +- Re: BAW1john larkin
22 Jan 25        `* Re: BAW2John R Walliker
25 Jan 25         `- Re: BAW1John R Walliker

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal