Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.
De : jrwalliker (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John R Walliker)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Jan 2025, 13:03:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmvvie$24ugd$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/01/2025 11:40, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
In article <vmum11$n7g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>,
Edward Rawde <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
<SNIP>
This will show that this circuit is approaching 120dB down on harmonics.
So if you want to do better than that then you'll need an oscillator
circuit which has better performance to begin with. You can
then add gain control for constant level.
I've not so far found an oscillator circuit in LTSpice with better
harmonic distortion performance than this one.
You can, of course, try to use filtering to reduce the unwanted
harmonics. Removing the first four harmonics produced by this
circuit will get it approaching 130dB but don't ask me how that would be
measured in reality or what it would cost to do so even if
it can be measured.
 If I read the specs on capacitors, I fear that even a passive filter
would increase the distortion unless rigid air capacitors are used.
Comment?
In general:
In how far are passive electronic components ideal, distortion free?
(I read bad things about SMD capacitors.)
 Groetjes Albert
COG/NPO ceramics do not have the extreme non-linearities of some of the
other types.  Nor are they piezoelectric.
The only problem is that anything larger than about 10nF gets large,
expensive and possibly unobtainable.
PPS capacitors are available in larger values and have a low, but
not zero voltage coefficient.
John

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Jan 25 * Sinewave oscillator without gain control.15Edward Rawde
24 Jan 25 +* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.9Bill Sloman
24 Jan 25 i`* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.8Edward Rawde
29 Jan 25 i `* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.7Bill Sloman
29 Jan 25 i  +* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.2Edward Rawde
30 Jan 25 i  i`- Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.1Bill Sloman
29 Jan 25 i  +- Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.1Edward Rawde
29 Jan 25 i  +- Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.1Edward Rawde
30 Jan 25 i  `* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.2Edward Rawde
30 Jan 25 i   `- Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.1Bill Sloman
24 Jan 25 +* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.2albert
24 Jan 25 i`- Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.1John R Walliker
24 Jan 25 `* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.3john larkin
24 Jan 25  `* Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.2Edward Rawde
24 Jan 25   `- Re: Sinewave oscillator without gain control.1Edward Rawde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal