Re: BAW

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: BAW
De : jrwalliker (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John R Walliker)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 25. Jan 2025, 19:29:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn3ahl$2nhea$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 22/01/2025 18:40, John R Walliker wrote:
On 22/01/2025 09:36, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 1/22/25 09:38, John R Walliker wrote:
On 22/01/2025 04:30, Bill Sloman wrote:
On 22/01/2025 10:52 am, Buzz McCool wrote:
On 1/21/2025 10:56 AM, john larkin wrote:
>
This has got to crush the XO business. It looks like it's a single
chip that's encapsulated like any other IC. XOs are complex and need
hermetic cans.
>
XOs used to use handmounted crystals. There's nothing all that complicated about them, but low volume manufacture tends to be a bit knife and fork.
>
Looking through this BAW app note
https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snaa362/snaa362.pdf, I couldn't tell BAW devices would work at high altitude or in a vacuum. I have to ask because the "acoustic" in the name makes me want to make sure that some sort of atmosphere isn't needed.
>
As far as I can see these are surface acoustic wave devices. Integrated circuits are pretty well encapsulated. This one probably dumps any heat it generates into the board it is mounted on, which might run a bit warmer in a vacuum, but that would be the only risk I can see.
>
>
It does look more like bulk acoustic waves - hence the name!  There
is no cavity inside, so they should be immune to the effects of
helium, unlike the  oscillators that use MEMS resonators where it
appears that helium can diffuse through the silicon to clog up
the vacuum cavity.
Phase noise performance looks excellent as is the temperature
stability.
John
>
>
You can look up the patent:
<https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070285191A1/en>.
>
Apparently the resonator is built up layer by layer, first
the multi-layer Bragg reflector, then the bottom resonator
electrode, the resonator material itself, and finally the
top electrode. The patent does not mention a top reflector,
so such a resonator would need a bit of free space above.
>
The data sheet does however:
TI’s BAW resonator technology uses piezoelectric transduction
to generate high-Q resonance at 2.5 GHz. The
resonator is defined by the quadrilateral area overlaid by
top and bottom electrodes. Alternating high- and
low-acoustic impedance layers form acoustic mirrors beneath
the resonant body to prevent acoustic energy
leakage into the substrate. Furthermore, these acoustic mirrors
are also placed on top of the resonator stack
to protect the device from contamination and minimize energy
leakage into the package materials. This unique
dual-Bragg acoustic resonator (DBAR) allows efficient excitation
without the need of costly vacuum cavities
around the resonator. As a result, TI’s BAW resonator is
immune to frequency drift caused by absorption of
surface contaminants and can be directly placed in a non-hermetic
plastic package with the oscillator IC in small
standard oscillator footprints
John
The patent text is voluntarily vague about the materials
used for the reflector and resonator layers. They mention
lots of examples, without clearly saying what they really
used. I'd expect that most examples don't work.
>
Jeroen Belleman
 
The piezoelectric resonator layer is aluminium nitride according
to a video on the TI website.
John

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Jan 25 * BAW27john larkin
20 Jan 25 +* Re: BAW16Phil Hobbs
21 Jan 25 i`* Re: BAW15john larkin
22 Jan 25 i +- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: BAW13Cursitor Doom
22 Jan 25 i  `* Re: BAW12john larkin
23 Jan 25 i   `* Re: BAW11Cursitor Doom
23 Jan 25 i    `* Re: BAW10john larkin
25 Jan 25 i     `* Re: BAW9Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i      `* Re: BAW8john larkin
25 Jan 25 i       `* Re: BAW7Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i        `* Re: BAW6john larkin
25 Jan 25 i         +- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
25 Jan 25 i         `* Re: BAW4Cursitor Doom
26 Jan 25 i          `* Re: BAW3john larkin
26 Jan 25 i           `* Re: BAW2Phil Hobbs
26 Jan 25 i            `- Re: BAW1Cursitor Doom
20 Jan 25 `* Re: BAW10John R Walliker
21 Jan 25  `* Re: BAW9john larkin
21 Jan 25   `* Re: BAW8john larkin
22 Jan 25    `* Re: BAW7Buzz McCool
22 Jan 25     `* Re: BAW6Bill Sloman
22 Jan 25      `* Re: BAW5John R Walliker
22 Jan 25       `* Re: BAW4Jeroen Belleman
22 Jan 25        +- Re: BAW1john larkin
22 Jan 25        `* Re: BAW2John R Walliker
25 Jan 25         `- Re: BAW1John R Walliker

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal