Re: Buy land and ice on Mars

On 30/01/2025 9:03 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:02:34 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
 

On 1/30/25 01:18, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:16:55 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 1/29/25 19:14, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 20:32:10 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>

On 1/28/25 17:40, E.Laureti wrote:

>
Nothing will ever be colonized with rockets
>
www.asps.it/korolevtorta.jpg
>
https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>
www.asps.it/aliena222.htm

>
Newton rules. The only thing they get right is that there
will never be a large-scale exodus to other planets.
>
Jeroen Belleman

>
Newton was pre-QM and 400 years ago. If we don't destroy ourselves
first, I think we'll eventually find a way to colonise planets outside
of our solar system. But that will be a long, long tme away.

>
The thing is, we have unidentified objects in our skys that don't obey
the edicts of Newtonian physics. Clearly someone somewhere has the
capability of making what we believe is impossible trivial. That would
suggest interplanetary travel in realistic transit times is already
being carried out and has been for a very long time.
>

>
I cannot believe such claims. Stated as you do, it conflicts with my
knowledge of physics and therefore I must reject it.

 You can believe whatever you wish, of course. I'm simply saying that
this phenomenon has been reported by legions of witnesses, many of
whom are commercial and military pilots and should therefore know very
well whether what they're looking at conforms to our present
understanding of physics or not.

You are talking about flying saucers. People report what they think they see, but optical effects aren't solid objects, no matter what they may look like.
This is the kind of fatuous nonsense that you seem to be addicted to, but more rational people don't take it seriously.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney