Re: Valve frequency multipliers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Valve frequency multipliers
De : cd (at) *nospam* notformail.com (Cursitor Doom)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Feb 2025, 00:52:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <0goqpj9hnlpdoigigor0ea8go133fntoc8@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 07:36:22 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 13:51:25 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>
I am trying to use a 15 Mc/s crystal oscillator to generate a 150 Mc/s
signal, the obvious multiplication ratios are x5 and x2.   The 150 Mc/s
has to be distributed to two other units by a 120-ohm screened cable.
>
The whole thing must be done with the minimum number of valves and no
semiconductors.
>
Why?

Why not? Sounds like fun!

>
The Colpitts-derived xtal oscillator is an EF91 and the
multiplier stage(s) can be either another EF91 or an ECC91. 
>
Why not use a 150 MHz xtal?

You'd be well into overtone territory by then. ISTR fundamentals are
limited to about 20Mhz. That may or may not matter in this instance.

>
I have tried picking the x5 signal (75 Mc/s) off the anode of the
oscillator with a tuned circuit but can only get a couple of volts
pk/pk.  This isn't enough to drive the ECC91, which I  had hoped could
be used as a 'push-push' doubler, it also won't drive an EF91 over
enough of the curved portion of its characteristic to give sufficient
frequency-doubled signal.
>
Alternatively, I have tried using a parallel-tuned circuit at 15 Mc/s in
the anode of the xtal oscillator to drive one of the triodes of the
ECC91 which can then act as the multiplier.  There is a whopping great
15 Mc/s signal going into the grid of the triode (about 25v pk/pk) and,
with the cathode earthed, this develops enough grid-leak bias that the
valve is conducting anode pulses of over 20 mA about 10% of the time.
>
I would have thought that under those conditions the triode would have
given a large signal at 75 Mc/s in an anode circuit tuned to that
frequency - but it doesn't appear to.  I can't use the triodes as
straight earthed-cathode amplifiers at those frequencies because of the
Miller capacitance effect, but they should be perfectly satisfactory as
multipliers where the grid and anode circuits are  tuned to different
frequencies.
>
Does anyone know how to determine the optimum conditions for generating
the 5th and 2nd harmionics in valves?
>
One dual triode could make two injection-locked oscillators.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Jan 25 * Valve frequency multipliers52Liz Tuddenham
31 Jan 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3john larkin
31 Jan 25 i+- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers29Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers28john larkin
1 Feb 25 i +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2john larkin
1 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
1 Feb 25 i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers24Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Martin Brown
1 Feb 25 i  i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2legg
1 Feb 25 i  i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers19john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers12Liz Tuddenham
1 Feb 25 i   i+- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers10Martin Brown
1 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers9john larkin
1 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers8Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 i   i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers7john larkin
2 Feb 25 i   i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers6Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25 i   i     `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Cursitor Doom
2 Feb 25 i   i      `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4Phil Hobbs
2 Feb 25 i   i       +- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Cursitor Doom
3 Feb 25 i   i       `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2John S
4 Feb 25 i   i        `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers6legg
4 Feb 25 i    +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3john larkin
4 Feb 25 i    i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Phil Hobbs
5 Feb 25 i    i `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Tauno Voipio
5 Feb 25 i     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1legg
1 Feb 25 `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers19legg
1 Feb 25  +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers13Liz Tuddenham
2 Feb 25  i+* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Tauno Voipio
2 Feb 25  ii`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25  ii `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3Tauno Voipio
3 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Liz Tuddenham
3 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Tauno Voipio
4 Feb 25  i`* Re: Valve frequency multipliers7legg
4 Feb 25  i +- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
4 Feb 25  i `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers4john larkin
5 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers3John S
5 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Liz Tuddenham
5 Feb 25  i     `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1john larkin
9 Feb 25  `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers5Liz Tuddenham
9 Feb 25   +* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2Tauno Voipio
9 Feb 25   i`- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham
10 Feb 25   `* Re: Valve frequency multipliers2legg
10 Feb 25    `- Re: Valve frequency multipliers1Liz Tuddenham

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal