Re: 1kHz 130dB distortion sinewave oscillator.

On 3/02/2025 2:46 am, john larkin wrote:

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 00:50:10 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnn0gk$i856$1@dont-email.me...

On 2/02/2025 3:05 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnmpgh$dafg$1@dont-email.me...

On 2/02/2025 4:26 am, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnl3gl$30im$1@dont-email.me...

On 1/02/2025 4:37 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnka4g$3ut8i$1@dont-email.me...

On 1/02/2025 1:34 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vnim5i$3hnrj$1@dont-email.me...

On 31/01/2025 5:47 am, Edward Rawde wrote:

Approaching 130dB now. Any suggestions for improvement?

...

I'll pass.

>
If your circuit design skills are demonstrated by a circuit which uses 93 components (which includes 9 transistors and 10
integrated
circuits) and only gets 60dB down on harmonics then I agree that pass is for the best.

>
If you think that circuit design skills can be assessed by counting components, we can draw our own conclusions.

>
Stop making me laugh please Bill.

 If you are unemployable and never build what you simulate, more parts
are no problem.

Of course it's nice to minimise the parts count, but that's not the only thing you should pay attention to. Most 82-year-olds are unemployable - some of them because they are dead or close to it. I used to build quite a lot of what I simulated, but it would be more of a performance these days.

Who is "we" anyway. You sound like you speak for everyone here.

 That's the Royal We.

Not exactly. It certainly didn't include you or Cursitor Doom.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney