Re: Twitter/X

On 4/02/2025 9:33 am, john larkin wrote:

On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 14:00:52 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
 

"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message news:kicvpjt4ojmvvhkc65174g9pvdl2umf046@4ax.com...

Gentlemen,
>
I've just noticed the vast majority (no exaggeration) of my Twitter
(X) following consists of young women with huge backsides keen to
flaunt the goods in their profile photos. I have nothing in common
with them and I can't believe they have any interest in the subjects I
post about. WTF is going on here?

>
John got there before me but could it be that they are trying to get you to buy whatever goods they are advertising?
>

Has anyone else encountered this
situation?

>
I've never used Twitter/X
>

If I was in some group on X dedicated to discussing young
women with large bums I could understand it, but I'm not.

>
Perhaps you are one of the few people who aren't?
>

>
CD

>

 I'm not! I like skinny women with good incomes.

That's strange. I like women who are in good shape - which is to say not overweight, but with enough muscular development not to look skinny.
Skinny implies scrawny and under-fed. That's not sexy.
Having a good income suggests that you fit into your social environment, but it can also just represent a fortunate occurrence of ancestors, and both Elon Musk and Donald Trump have that.
The historic preference for well-rounded women reflects an environment where most people were under-fed, and skinny women probably weren't ovulating and weren't fertile.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney