Sujet : Re: Twitter/X
De : JL (at) *nospam* gct.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 04. Feb 2025, 16:34:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <aqc4qjp44mms5alcupe83us96n6r99s06b@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 10:13:39 +0000,
liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 14:00:52 -0500, "Edward Rawde"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
"Cursitor Doom" <cd@notformail.com> wrote in message
news:kicvpjt4ojmvvhkc65174g9pvdl2umf046@4ax.com... > Gentlemen, >
I've just noticed the vast majority (no exaggeration) of my Twitter
(X) following consists of young women with huge backsides keen to
flaunt the goods in their profile photos. I have nothing in common
with them and I can't believe they have any interest in the subjects I
post about. WTF is going on here?
>
John got there before me but could it be that they are trying to get you
to buy whatever goods they are advertising?
>
Has anyone else encountered this
situation?
>
I've never used Twitter/X
>
If I was in some group on X dedicated to discussing young
women with large bums I could understand it, but I'm not.
>
Perhaps you are one of the few people who aren't?
>
>
CD
>
I'm not! I like skinny women with good incomes.
>
With or without large outgoings?
Do you refer to anatomy or finance?
Small in both cases.