Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 16. Feb 2025, 06:19:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vorsg8$emeo$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16/02/2025 2:18 pm, Edward Rawde wrote:
"JM" <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> wrote in message news:gp6vqjl5oma32tga136kspreh7a8182ofg@4ax.com...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:18:01 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
>
Basically same idea, but two separate controllable asymmetric current
mirrors, rather than one, and no current steering. The half-wave
rectifier still seems to be the source of the distortion in the
stabilised output.
>
C25 and C26 take out as much of it as I can. Increasing them - from 15nF
to 33nF makes the distortion worse. Splitting the resistors into three
rather than two and adding two more capacitors might help, but what this
circuit needs is more insight, rather than more components.
>
What is the point of a push-pull current mirror?  You don't need
response at dc.  A "class A" (for want of a better term) mirror with
minimal current deviation will have distortion levels orders of
magnitude less than the circuit you propose.
>
 Is there any specific reason for the npn Q5?
Replacing it and R25 with a single 100k resistor from U2 to Q1 base seems to work just as well.
2kHz is 141dB down measured with cursors on a zoomed in FFT in LTSPice 24.1.2
Complementary pairs often work better than simple emitter followers. John May probably has a good reason for the choice. I've used them from time to time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sziklai_pair
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Feb 25 * A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components32Bill Sloman
12 Feb 25 +* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components10Bill Sloman
13 Feb 25 i`* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components9Edward Rawde
13 Feb 25 i `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components8Bill Sloman
13 Feb 25 i  `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components7Edward Rawde
14 Feb 25 i   `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components6Bill Sloman
14 Feb 25 i    `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components5Edward Rawde
14 Feb 25 i     +- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Edward Rawde
14 Feb 25 i     `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components3JM
14 Feb 25 i      `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2Edward Rawde
15 Feb 25 i       `- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
14 Feb 25 `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components21JM
15 Feb 25  +* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25  i`- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25  `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components18Edward Rawde
16 Feb 25   +* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components15Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25   i`* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components14Edward Rawde
17 Feb 25   i `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components13Bill Sloman
17 Feb 25   i  `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components12Edward Rawde
17 Feb 25   i   +- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
17 Feb 25   i   `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components10Edward Rawde
18 Feb 25   i    `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components9Bill Sloman
18 Feb 25   i     `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components8Edward Rawde
18 Feb 25   i      `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components7Bill Sloman
18 Feb 25   i       `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components6Edward Rawde
19 Feb 25   i        `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components5Bill Sloman
19 Feb 25   i         `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components4Edward Rawde
19 Feb 25   i          `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components3Bill Sloman
19 Feb 25   i           `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2Edward Rawde
19 Feb 25   i            `- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1Bill Sloman
16 Feb 25   `* Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components2JM
21 Feb 25    `- Re: A variation on my current mirror low distortion sine wave oscillator - 10dB less distortion and much the same number of components1JM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal