Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
"JM" <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> wrote in message news:gp6vqjl5oma32tga136kspreh7a8182ofg@4ax.com...Complementary pairs often work better than simple emitter followers. John May probably has a good reason for the choice. I've used them from time to time.On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:18:01 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>Is there any specific reason for the npn Q5?
wrote:
>Basically same idea, but two separate controllable asymmetric current>
mirrors, rather than one, and no current steering. The half-wave
rectifier still seems to be the source of the distortion in the
stabilised output.
>
C25 and C26 take out as much of it as I can. Increasing them - from 15nF
to 33nF makes the distortion worse. Splitting the resistors into three
rather than two and adding two more capacitors might help, but what this
circuit needs is more insight, rather than more components.
What is the point of a push-pull current mirror? You don't need
response at dc. A "class A" (for want of a better term) mirror with
minimal current deviation will have distortion levels orders of
magnitude less than the circuit you propose.
>
Replacing it and R25 with a single 100k resistor from U2 to Q1 base seems to work just as well.
2kHz is 141dB down measured with cursors on a zoomed in FFT in LTSPice 24.1.2
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.