Re: OT: Cracking Speech by JDV!

On 20/02/2025 1:20 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:51:47 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
 

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>

On 2/18/2025 5:57 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:

Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
>

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:47:53 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

<snip>

If a man wanted to spy in women, he would not go through all the legal
and medical hoops of pretending to be transgender, he would just get on
and do it.  By conflating predatory men with transgender people they are
using this to try to make life intolerable for an already-vulnerable
group of people.

 But that's not what's happening. What we are being asked to swallow is
men who simply "identify" as women being allowed access into all sorts
of areas where they would normally be forbidden.

The practical difficulties of being able to "identify" as somebody of a particular sex when it doesn't line up with your sex chromosomes means that it isn't in the least "simple". Claiming that the men involved "simply identify as women" is a gross miss-representation of the process.
It makes great rhetoric, but it's a blatant lie.

This is the height of woke madness.

In your dreams.

Those kind of people have no legal and medical hoops
they're obliged to go through; they just say: "I'm a woman" and
they're good to go!

Do try it sometime. Your enthusiasm for posting fatuous nonsense suggests that you could imagine that it would work.
G K Chesteron wrote a very funny piece about an anarchist trying to pass himself off as bishop by saying the kinds things that bishops were imagined to say by anarchists. I imagine your efforts at pretending to be transgender would work just as badly.
You might read up on one of the early examples
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Morris
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney