Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:03:46 +0100, Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk>if it had numbers you'd still need to explain what goes to what number, or just have the names/numbers on the box next to each pin
wrote:
On 2/23/25 16:45, john larkin wrote:We used a similar part, and it was very hard to un-mate. We use theOn Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:02:30 +0100, Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk>>
wrote:
>On 2/14/25 17:37, john larkin wrote:>Does anyone have a favorite high-current PCB connector?>
>
I'd like to get 20 wires into a pluggable connector, to go on a module
like this:
>
https://highlandtechnology.com/Product/P948
>
We need at least 7 amps per contact.
>
That litle green Phoenix connector is cool. Wires screw into it
without tooling, and it's easy to mate and unmate. But it's only 5
pins.
>
I was planning to use four of them, with two on a baby board, but that
idea wasn't popular.
>
https://www.mouser.ca/ProductDetail/Phoenix-Contact/1842979?qs=aYsvlkyO7qM1vWO95kklEQ%3D%3D
The problem with those connectorfs, and the Weidmuller equivalents, is
that humans aren't strong enough to un-mate them. And the spring-push
wire clamps are flakey. And that they have no no opinions about pin
numbering.
>
We've used a lot of those plugable connectors, never seemed like a
problem to unmate them
version with the cam now, but only a few of their connectors have the
un-mate cam.
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/phoenix-contact/1808912/3439844
>And since the connectors are unmarked, we have to explain the pin
doesn't have to be spring clamps,
https://www.digikey.dk/da/products/detail/phoenix-contact/1803633/260535
>
if there no number you decide what to call the pins
numbering to our customers, with pictures in manuals.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.