Re: Fuzz boxes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Fuzz boxes
De : joegwinn (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Joe Gwinn)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 24. Feb 2025, 23:54:50
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <k4uprj1s4e9k2snedq919irsp72idipc1a@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:04:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:30:41 +0000, TTman <kraken.sankey@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
Can anyone explain why the best ones seem to use germanium transtors, (
and 'matched pairs' at that)? Why not a simple op amp with back to back
diodes? Any circuits?
>
I designed the signal path for the Ryder amps.
>
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index.php?threads/ryder-amps-cabs-from-the60s.663614/
>
They were named for a co-worker, Frank Ryder, who was also a small
plane aerobatic instructor. The only time I ever got close to motion
sick was after an hour flying with him.
>
The Ryder amp had a path that used a tracking diode clipper followed
by a diferentiator. They called it "bell tone", not fuzz. It had a
"long sustain", whatever that means.

Low damping, so the tone dies away slowly.

Joe G

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * Fuzz boxes7TTman
24 Feb 25 +* Re: Fuzz boxes4john larkin
24 Feb 25 i+* Re: Fuzz boxes2bitrex
26 Feb 25 ii`- Re: Fuzz boxes1Lasse Langwadt
24 Feb 25 i`- Re: Fuzz boxes1Joe Gwinn
24 Feb 25 `* Re: Fuzz boxes2Jeff Liebermann
24 Feb 25  `- Re: Fuzz boxes1Jeff Liebermann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal