Re: "Universal" symbols

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: "Universal" symbols
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Mar 2025, 09:59:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vq6fdd$1pt47$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 3/4/2025 1:27 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
 [...]
I've used other symbols in a conventional manner (e.g., ^ for "this
end up").
 Just a small point:  The legend "This Side Up" is pointless on the top
side but "Other Side Up" on the bottom side is far more useful.
Text is eschewed because it is monolingual AND hard to read
without eyesight.
A symbol can be seen or felt to identify it's general characteristics.
(Imagine "feeling" the traditional barrel connector polarity identifiers;
how large would they have to be for you to be able to discern their
intent?  Now, imagine having neuropathy diminish the sensitivity in
your fingertips...)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Mar 25 * "Universal" symbols3Don Y
4 Mar 25 `* Re: "Universal" symbols2Liz Tuddenham
4 Mar 25  `- Re: "Universal" symbols1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal