Re: Security fasteners

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Security fasteners
De : erichpwagner (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (piglet)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Mar 2025, 15:25:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vq72fs$1tdh7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
What value "security fasteners"?  One can purchase "drivers"
for damn near any of them, cheap.
 
Is the intent to discourage *casual* disassembly (given that
anyone determined to do so can purchase same)?  Perhaps to
be able to argue (in a court of law) that the other party
took "extraordinary measures" to gain access to the internals
of your product (so, if he was injured in the process, it
shouldn't fall on your shoulders)
 
Or, the hope of *actually* preventing disassembly?
 
I.e., wouldn't a tamper-proof "seal" be cheaper and more
conclusive?
 
 

One way clutch head screws exist, can be tightened clockwise but cam out
counter clockwise.


--
piglet

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Mar 25 * Security fasteners12Don Y
4 Mar 25 +* Re: Security fasteners7Liz Tuddenham
4 Mar 25 i`* Re: Security fasteners6Don Y
4 Mar 25 i +* Re: Security fasteners4Liz Tuddenham
4 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Security fasteners3Don Y
4 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Security fasteners2Liz Tuddenham
4 Mar 25 i i  `- Re: Security fasteners1Don Y
4 Mar 25 i `- Re: Security fasteners1john larkin
4 Mar 25 +* Re: Security fasteners2piglet
4 Mar 25 i`- Re: Security fasteners1Don Y
6 Mar 25 +- Re: Security fasteners1Don Y
6 Mar 25 `- Re: Security fasteners1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal