Sujet : Re: unfortunate part number
De : jl (at) *nospam* 650pot.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 04. Mar 2025, 16:58:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <be8esj5n1k355hdcith7pfcbav900fbthf@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:06:57 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.electronicdesign.com/part-details?part_number=vom1271t&manufacturer=vishaysemiconductors
>
Well, its specially designed to drive PUK-packaged FETS.
Maybe some part was upset by an STSPIN bridge.
>
Cheers
>
Phil Hobbs
I wonder what is the longest electronic part number.
I like HH Smith. Part number 101.
unfortunate part number
Re: unfortunate part number