Sujet : Re: half and full bridge chips
De : invalid (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Edward Rawde)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 13. Mar 2025, 16:28:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vqutjf$123t$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
"john larkin" <jlArbor.com> wrote in message
news:l3s5tjtkiu5mgf88ro6340cqtogi14nelg@4ax.com...I'm designing some products that need 48-volt half or full-bridge
drivers. Not just gate drivers but the whole thing.
>
We tried the TI DRV8962. It has lots of voltage and current range and
has four half bridges, but its shoot-through power dissipation is high
and limits its frequency to about 200 KHz.
>
We found the STSPIN958.
"Maximum output current up to 5 Arms"?
Has to be a misspelling of Amps I thought.
But table 2.1 does imply Amps rms.
It's been a while since I used Si9978. No surprise it's obsolete now.
What a goofy part number. One of my software
guys wants to play with hardware so we got two eval boards, assuming
he'd blow one up learning. His rig is a nightmare and he's shorted all
sorts of things but it won't blow up. It looks really nice and could
be an audio amp or a servo driver or a TEC driver. It's rated for 500
KHz but he ran it at 1 MHz and it just gets a bit warmer.
>
The slew rate control and adjustable current limit are slick.
>
The data sheet is horrible and the eval board is very weird.
>
Why do some europeans put their data sheets in strange order, like the
table of contents somewhere near the end?