On 2025-03-13 17:30, Joe Gwinn wrote:> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:12:08 -0400, Phil Hobbs
> <
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-03-13 12:22, john larkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:08:47 -0400, Phil Hobbs
>>> <
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-13 10:41, john larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 07:42:28 -0400, legg <
legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:35:38 -0700, john larkin <jlArbor.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/qpfhkvbfig7elysx78lq3/ALGqgMaRq1tx8aIiN3p1TfM?rlkey=36bcqfdb9di22ko48j89vocut&dl=0 >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I put two of these drum core inductors close together, and get the
>>>>>>> phasing right, I get an extra 5 mH for free, without any more ESR. And
>>>>>>> external mag fields drop too, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Check ripple and transient load response (load one - measure the
>>>>>> other).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If chanels not synchronized at the switching frequency, odd results
>>>>>> might be seen at mixing frequency.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RL
>>>>>
>>>>> The two inductors will be in the two legs of, basically, a floating
>>>>> power supply, to decouple it from whatever customer impedance. So I'll
>>>>> be running the exact same current through both inductors. If I get the
>>>>> polarities right, I get the bonus inductance and the far-field
>>>>> magnetic cancellation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't want signal coupling to other channels on the same board, so
>>>>> the field cancellation benefit is squared. That overcomes some
>>>>> peoples' objections to unshielded drum cores.
>>>>>
>>>>> The physics is kinda weird. The 5 mH per inductor uses the universe
>>>>> for its energy storage, but the bonus L is energy stored in ferrite, I
>>>>> guess. I just invented the semi-shielded inductor.
>>>>
>>>> The far field won't cancel, unfortunately. Coupled inductors in series
>>>> have a total inductance
>>>>
>>>> Lseries = L1 + L2 +- 2M.
>>>>
>>>> Since your inductance is going up, the current is going the same
>>>> direction in both cores, so the in the low frequency limit, the B field
>>>> contributions add everywhere.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Phil Hobbs
>>>
>>> If one core has a north pole up while the other is south, the flux
>>> makes a tight local loop. That makes L go up. It's approaching an
>>> all-ferrite gapless inductor.
>>>
>>> I tested the theory with a probe coil. Along the centerline of the two
>>> vertical inductors, induced field is zero. The two 5 mH inductors in
>>> series add up to 16 mH in this configuration.
>>>
>>> If the two series cores have current in the same direction, I get a
>>> bunch of field radiated and only about 8 mH net. It's kinda like
>>> winding all that wire onto one big drum core.
>>
>> Ah, okay, I forgot that your inductors are actually vertical not
>> horizontal. My bad.
>
> Isn't this the difference between a dipole field and a quadrupole
> field, regardless of vertical or horizontal?
>
> Joe
>
A quadrupole is basically a current distribution whose total dipole moment is near zero, e.g. two closely-spaced antiparallel dipoles like John's.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs