Sujet : Re: hefty data sheet
De : jlArbor.com (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 16. Mar 2025, 22:05:38
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <o2fetj5i4m3a8p6ne7ufql5s241m3n7g58@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 20:37:55 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 3/16/25 10:27, Martin Brown wrote:
On 15/03/2025 19:39, john larkin wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:56:25 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 3/14/2025 6:34 PM, john larkin wrote:
https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruim2
>
That's 10419 pages. Has anyone seen a bigger data sheet?
>
And what's a spruim?
>
>
I need a printed copy to put on someone's desk when they says "8 bit is
obsolete, just use an ARM"
>
If you print on both sides, the stack will be about 2 feet high.
Better buy some toner things.
Perhaps they are trying for the Guinness Book of Records?
Longest meaningless datasheet.
It would take an army of engineers to use a chip like that. That would
need a giant market.
I think there is a lot of duplication from a (very) quick scan.
IOW the authors were paid by the word.
>
Don't you guys simply look for another chip if the manual is
too much to digest?
>
I would.
>
Jeroen Belleman
>
That part was recommended to me by our TI rep. I have no interest in
even reading the manual, much less trying to design something with it.
I like simple, like an RP2040 and an Efinix T20.