Re: hefty data sheet

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: hefty data sheet
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 17. Mar 2025, 04:42:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vr85n1$35ter$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 3/15/2025 3:02 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
why would that multicore monster be relevant to that in any way?
IME, clients (bosses?) are pretty clueless about device capabilities,
software efforts, etc.  They pick up on some buzz words that happen
to be /en vogue/ and throw them around as if they had real meaning
in the context used.
I had a client ask me if I could implement his product in a *PIC*
(because THAT was /en vogue/).  When I looked at the design, it
was all RF signal processing.  With *detailed* knowledge of his
domain, I *might* have been able to come up with an approach
that could *use* a PIC.  But, I surely wasn't going to be able to
implement his *existing* design in one!
Agile, Python, Perl, PIC, ARM, bananafudgesundae... whatever
they think is meaningful, today...

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 25 * hefty data sheet15john larkin
15 Mar 25 +- Re: hefty data sheet1Bill Sloman
15 Mar 25 +* Re: hefty data sheet2Liz Tuddenham
15 Mar 25 i`- Re: hefty data sheet1Don Y
15 Mar 25 +* Re: hefty data sheet8john larkin
15 Mar 25 i+* Re: hefty data sheet2Sergey Kubushyn
16 Mar 25 ii`- Re: hefty data sheet1Don Y
16 Mar 25 i`* Re: hefty data sheet5Martin Brown
16 Mar 25 i `* Re: hefty data sheet4Jeroen Belleman
16 Mar 25 i  +- Re: hefty data sheet1john larkin
18 Mar 25 i  `* Re: hefty data sheet2Martin Brown
18 Mar 25 i   `- Re: hefty data sheet1Don Y
15 Mar 25 +* Re: hefty data sheet2Lasse Langwadt
17 Mar 25 i`- Re: hefty data sheet1Don Y
16 Mar 25 `- Re: hefty data sheet1Don Y

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal