Re: Binocular choke extras

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: Binocular choke extras
De : jeroen (at) *nospam* nospam.please (Jeroen Belleman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Mar 2025, 23:55:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vri6dh$6npc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
On 3/20/25 21:15, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
Jeroen Belleman wrote:
Don wrote:
 <snip>
 
It's difficult for me to follow this conversation. Maybe my followup
simply repeats what you guys already said.
      The tubes are shields designed to fit inside the binocular core
holes. You then soldier them together with a PCB at each end like so:
>
      <https://www.qsl.net/g3oou/BBTrans_4278a.jpg>
>
It becomes more interesting with coax:
>
      <https://www.qsl.net/kf8od/ldmos53.jpg>
>
Not at both ends! That is not going to work!
>
What you say makes sense in retrospect.
 In retro-retrospect what you say doesn't make sense. Is
<https://www.qsl.net/kf8od/ldmos53.jpg> wrong? It says to solder both
ends.
That one is OK. The tubes connect on one end, but not on the other.
There's a gap between the sides in the bottom picture. It will work,
though if I were to make it, I wouldn't bother using coax for the
high-impedance winding.

 What flummoxes me is why shielded coax is is itself inserted into a
separately shielded sleeve?
Agreed. The coax shields are simply in parallel with the single-turn
low-impedance winding formed by the tubes. Maybe it shifts the upper
cut-off frequency a tiny bit upwards, but I'm not convinced it's worth
the trouble.
Jeroen Belleman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Mar 25 * Binocular choke extras24Liz Tuddenham
19 Mar 25 `* Re: Binocular choke extras23Jeroen Belleman
20 Mar 25  +* Re: Binocular choke extras18Liz Tuddenham
20 Mar 25  i`* Re: Binocular choke extras17Joe Gwinn
20 Mar 25  i +* Re: Binocular choke extras7Don
20 Mar 25  i i`* Re: Binocular choke extras6Jeroen Belleman
20 Mar 25  i i `* Re: Binocular choke extras5Don
20 Mar 25  i i  `* Re: Binocular choke extras4Don
20 Mar 25  i i   +- Re: Binocular choke extras1Jeroen Belleman
21 Mar 25  i i   `* Re: Binocular choke extras2Don
21 Mar 25  i i    `- Re: Binocular choke extras1Don
20 Mar 25  i `* Re: Binocular choke extras9john larkin
20 Mar 25  i  +* Re: Binocular choke extras4Joe Gwinn
21 Mar 25  i  i`* Re: Binocular choke extras3Jeroen Belleman
21 Mar 25  i  i `* Re: Binocular choke extras2Joe Gwinn
21 Mar 25  i  i  `- Re: Binocular choke extras1Jeroen Belleman
21 Mar 25  i  `* Re: Binocular choke extras4Jeroen Belleman
21 Mar 25  i   +* Re: Binocular choke extras2john larkin
21 Mar 25  i   i`- Re: Binocular choke extras1Jeroen Belleman
21 Mar 25  i   `- Re: Binocular choke extras1Phil Hobbs
20 Mar 25  `* Re: Binocular choke extras4legg
21 Mar 25   `* Re: Binocular choke extras3john larkin
21 Mar 25    `* Re: Binocular choke extras2Phil Hobbs
21 Mar 25     `- Re: Binocular choke extras1john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal