Re: really big physics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: really big physics
De : user (at) *nospam* example.net (bitrex)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Apr 2025, 20:35:16
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <67ec3fab$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/1/2025 2:02 PM, john larkin wrote:
 https://www.breitbart.com/news/scientists-release-plans-for-an-even-bigger-atom-smasher-along-the-french-swiss-border/
 
Watching the technocrat STEM supremacy-type conservatives fight it out with the back-to-nature, government should never do anything except enforce the 10 Commandments, science is the tool of Satan-style conservatives in the comments is always a treat.
At least one correctly notes that it was a Democrat-majority Congress that cancelled the Superconducting Super Collider in '93. I wonder how many of the Clinton administration's playbooks are left lying around in DC, the Clintons should probably sue DOGE for plagiarizing their ideas.
But the Reagan administration sure was a different time it's like the right simply hasn't really known what to do with itself for 30 years, until Trump showed up to give this cat-herding exercise a heavy dose of identity politics to bond over.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * really big physics27john larkin
1 Apr 25 `* Re: really big physics26bitrex
1 Apr 25  `* Re: really big physics25john larkin
2 Apr 25   +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
2 Apr 25   `* Re: really big physics23Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25    +* Re: really big physics9john larkin
3 Apr 25    i+- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i`* Re: really big physics7bitrex
3 Apr 25    i +* Re: really big physics4Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25    i i+* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i ii`- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i i`- Re: really big physics1Phil Hobbs
3 Apr 25    i `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i  `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    `* Re: really big physics13bitrex
3 Apr 25     `* Re: really big physics12john larkin
3 Apr 25      +* Re: really big physics8Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i`* Re: really big physics7john larkin
4 Apr 25      i +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      i `* Re: really big physics5Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i  `* Re: really big physics4john larkin
4 Apr 25      i   `* Re: really big physics3Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i    `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
5 Apr 25      i     `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      +- Re: really big physics1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25      `* Re: really big physics2Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25       `- Re: really big physics1bitrex

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal