Re: really big physics

On Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:59:09 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:35:16 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>

On 4/1/2025 2:02 PM, john larkin wrote:

 
https://www.breitbart.com/news/scientists-release-plans-for-an-even-bigger-atom-smasher-along-the-french-swiss-border/
 

>
Watching the technocrat STEM supremacy-type conservatives fight it out
with the back-to-nature, government should never do anything except
enforce the 10 Commandments, science is the tool of Satan-style
conservatives in the comments is always a treat.

>
>
Gosh, what are you smoking today?
>

>
At least one correctly notes that it was a Democrat-majority Congress
that cancelled the Superconducting Super Collider in '93. I wonder how
many of the Clinton administration's playbooks are left lying around in
DC, the Clintons should probably sue DOGE for plagiarizing their ideas.

>
We managed to make some money on the SSC. They actually built the
helium processing facility in Waxahatchie, and we sold them a bunch of
CAMAC cryogenics instrumentation, liquid helium temperature and level
measuring stuff.
>

>
But the Reagan administration sure was a different time it's like the
right simply hasn't really known what to do with itself for 30 years,
until Trump showed up to give this cat-herding exercise a heavy dose of
identity politics to bond over.

>
Makes you sad.

The best thing for the West right now is a hefty dose of nationalistic
patriotism (but without the bellicose element which we can well do
without, of course). Globalism has impoverished us, and will continue
to do so until its proponents are crushed and sanity restored.