Re: really big physics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: really big physics
De : jlArbor.com (at) *nospam* nirgendwo (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 03. Apr 2025, 12:31:32
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <pirsuj97ib9kvejf52g988vqsqnq9s5kvc@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:14:46 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
On 4/2/2025 4:46 PM, john larkin wrote:
 
The best thing for the West right now is a hefty dose of nationalistic
patriotism (but without the bellicose element which we can well do
without, of course). Globalism has impoverished us, and will continue
to do so until its proponents are crushed and sanity restored.
 
Competition makes most everything better. In the USA, we have states
competing for people and businesses. Europe would be better off with
more (peaceful!) competition between countries and less globalist
bureaucracy.
 
If the US shuts out the whole world, then the whole world will be all
alone without us. Checkmate, world!
>
If the US shuts out the whole world, then theUS will be all
alone without the rest of the World. Checkmate,US!

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/styles/card/public/2025-04/GettyImages-2208184612.jpg?h=199d8c1f&itok=aHFHHcAS

Open borders and wildly asymmetric tarriffs benefit the coastal elites
and hurt the flyover-territory working class, namely increase
inequality in the US. I think the working people feel this
intuitively, and voted suitably.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * really big physics27john larkin
1 Apr 25 `* Re: really big physics26bitrex
1 Apr 25  `* Re: really big physics25john larkin
2 Apr 25   +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
2 Apr 25   `* Re: really big physics23Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25    +* Re: really big physics9john larkin
3 Apr 25    i+- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i`* Re: really big physics7bitrex
3 Apr 25    i +* Re: really big physics4Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25    i i+* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i ii`- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i i`- Re: really big physics1Phil Hobbs
3 Apr 25    i `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i  `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    `* Re: really big physics13bitrex
3 Apr 25     `* Re: really big physics12john larkin
3 Apr 25      +* Re: really big physics8Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i`* Re: really big physics7john larkin
4 Apr 25      i +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      i `* Re: really big physics5Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i  `* Re: really big physics4john larkin
4 Apr 25      i   `* Re: really big physics3Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i    `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
5 Apr 25      i     `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      +- Re: really big physics1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25      `* Re: really big physics2Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25       `- Re: really big physics1bitrex

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal