Re: really big physics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: really big physics
De : bill.sloman (at) *nospam* ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 04. Apr 2025, 05:16:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsnmfs$2hij2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/04/2025 5:04 am, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 01:24:36 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
 
On 4/2/2025 1:02 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
But the Reagan administration sure was a different time it's like the
right simply hasn't really known what to do with itself for 30 years,
until Trump showed up to give this cat-herding exercise a heavy dose of
identity politics to bond over.
>
Makes you sad.
>
The best thing for the West right now is a hefty dose of nationalistic
patriotism (but without the bellicose element which we can well do
without, of course). Globalism has impoverished us, and will continue
to do so until its proponents are crushed and sanity restored.
>
<https://x.com/AmichaiStein1/status/1907545520303714520>
>
25% tariff on vehicles and a 20% tariff on Israel, really putting
previous "left wing" administrations to shame in certain areas to be fair.
 It's The Art of the Deal. Somebody wrote a book about that.
Actually Tony Schwartz ghost-wrote it to be published to exploit Donald Trump's public image.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_the_Deal
It was a great investment for the publisher, and boosted Trump's image no end. The fact that a number of Trump's business deals lead to huge bankruptcies is a warning that his supporters don't seem to be aware of.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Apr 25 * really big physics27john larkin
1 Apr 25 `* Re: really big physics26bitrex
1 Apr 25  `* Re: really big physics25john larkin
2 Apr 25   +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
2 Apr 25   `* Re: really big physics23Cursitor Doom
2 Apr 25    +* Re: really big physics9john larkin
3 Apr 25    i+- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i`* Re: really big physics7bitrex
3 Apr 25    i +* Re: really big physics4Liz Tuddenham
3 Apr 25    i i+* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i ii`- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    i i`- Re: really big physics1Phil Hobbs
3 Apr 25    i `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
3 Apr 25    i  `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
3 Apr 25    `* Re: really big physics13bitrex
3 Apr 25     `* Re: really big physics12john larkin
3 Apr 25      +* Re: really big physics8Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i`* Re: really big physics7john larkin
4 Apr 25      i +- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      i `* Re: really big physics5Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i  `* Re: really big physics4john larkin
4 Apr 25      i   `* Re: really big physics3Jeroen Belleman
4 Apr 25      i    `* Re: really big physics2john larkin
5 Apr 25      i     `- Re: really big physics1Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25      +- Re: really big physics1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25      `* Re: really big physics2Bill Sloman
4 Apr 25       `- Re: really big physics1bitrex

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal