Sujet : Re: UCC33420 dc/dc converter eval
De : pcdhSpamMeSenseless (at) *nospam* electrooptical.net (Phil Hobbs)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 11. Apr 2025, 18:37:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <726d1376-08bc-b201-fdcc-99d259a068b3@electrooptical.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0
On 2025-04-10 13:56, john larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:36:34 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
On 2025-04-10 12:11, john larkin wrote:
On 10 Apr 2025 15:56:04 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>
john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
On 10 Apr 2025 08:48:48 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
...
I think this high frequency noise should be easy to filter by some CLC
Filter.
>
Not really. I need it to be close to the load, and that load is super
noise sensitive. I didn't check, but there is no doubt some
considerable and nasty emitted mag fields too.
>
>
Of course, the vincinity of any isolated DCDC is super noisy. If
nothing else helps, think about battery power.
>
I'm considering a bootstrap circuit to handle the switching power
assisted by a photovoltaic source for steady-state. I can bootstrap
off my own output pulse.
>
That sounds like fun--if you do that, please let us know how it works!
The PVs are affordable and of course marvelously quiet, but they max
out typically below 100 uA. That gets tricky.
I could consider a tiny supercap, assuming that my users won't try to
make weeks-long pulses.
>
>
>
>
In addition to all the high frequency crud, there's the basic burst
and its side effects in the hundreds of KHz range, would would take
giant parts to filter.
>
Look at LDOs with good PSRR at high frequency. From the datasheet, the
TPS7A20XX is still in the 40 db range at 1 MHZ. The LT1963 may be
better, but is much more expensive, the TPS7A20 is rather cheap and
available.
>
There are interesting parts around now that include their own power
isolation. Some are capacitive, not inductive, so may be better.
>
>
What part do you expect to have capacitive power transport? Capacitive
signaling is however common.
>
B.t.w, looking at a ISOW7841, I also see frequency in the 50 Mhz
range.
>
I suspect it uses similar power isolation as the UCCpart.
>
>
Wuerth WPME-CDIP Capacitive Digital Isolator Powered talks about 13 MHz
>
ADE9113 has power isolation too, and it also sounds magnetic. I
thought I saw a capacitive power isolator somewhere.
>
>
Jim Williams used to write about piezoelectric transformers, back in his
CC-fluorescent backlight days. (May they never return--fluorescent
lights suck eggs.)
I always thought the piezo transformer was cute. The real HV isolator
is a motor and a generator and a fiberglass shaft, all surface-mount
of course.
I threw out a bunch of incandescent bulbs and wish I'd kept a few. I
don't miss CFs at all.
I have a couple of old Luxo adjustable desk lamps that I love--one at my drafting table and one at my workbench. They have a medium-base light socket surrounded by a 22-W circline fluorescent tube. I mostly use LED bulbs, but for testing things like photoreceivers, where the 40-kHz flicker is obnoxious, I have a medium-sized stock of 100-W, 1690-lumen tungsten bulbs that I collected back in 2012.
I'll happily send you a couple of packages if that would be useful.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D HobbsPrincipal ConsultantElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOpticsOptics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog ElectronicsBriarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.nethttp://hobbs-eo.com