Sujet : Re: acoustic imager
De : legg (at) *nospam* nospam.magma.ca (legg)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 16. Apr 2025, 17:39:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <gvmvvj980r40l5tnlfn798ur49o2kj9rm7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:41:06 -0700, john larkin <
jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:01:00 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:04:15 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
>
https://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai=DChsSEwjTjaDVg9uMAxW3Hq0GHVmKOlYYACICCAEQARoCcHY&co=1&cce=2&sig=AOD64_3aGs74magNuXwdRGFo7oP8zK-LMQ&ctype=5&q=&adurl=
>
>
For 42,000 dollars? There's a product there you could develop, John.
>
Seems like it needs maybe a dozen electret mikes, one mux'd ADC, an
FPGA, and some code.
>
I'd expect to see a Chinese version on Temu soon.
Imaging suggests 'bounce', recording requires directivity,filtering
reflections and long-term (?|)comparison. Back-ground vs spot?
Measure what?
RL
acoustic imager
Re: acoustic imager