Sujet : Re: acoustic imager
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 17. Apr 2025, 23:29:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <3uv20k90au5selk79v1hrfnb3it0ihj8g6@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:30:27 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <
jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:01:00 +0100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:04:15 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
>
https://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai=DChsSEwjTjaDVg9uMAxW3Hq0GHVmKOlYYACICCAEQARoCcHY&co=1&cce=2&sig=AOD64_3aGs74magNuXwdRGFo7oP8zK-LMQ&ctype=5&q=&adurl=
>
For 42,000 dollars? There's a product there you could develop, John.
>
It's only $19,998.99 from Fluke:
Lots of significant digits!
<https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/industrial-imaging/fluke-ii905>
That might have been the price from before the tariffs arrived:
"Ships from supplier. Expected to arrive on or before Tue. May 06."
"Country of Origin: China (subject to change)"
I wonder how much money Fluke (or Apple) saves by manufacturing in
China. A pick-and-place machine runs just as fast here.
(subject to change) sounds hopeful.