Re: energy in UK

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: energy in UK
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 18. Apr 2025, 01:43:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vts76s$1pp9l$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 4/17/2025 1:58 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2025-04-17 21:59, Don Y wrote:
On 4/17/2025 7:38 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
 
Here, there is value in having solid state metering.  It allows
different monitoring schemes to be implemented without requiring a
completely different mechanical metering system.  Eliminates
the meter reader.  Provides dynamic load monitoring at the customer
level.  Remote fault detection.  etc.
>
Most of which benefits the supplier, not the consumer.
>
Of course!  Our electronic water meters include the ability to detect
likely leaks (i.e., if water runs continuously then it is likely a sign
of a leaking toilet fixture, etc.).
>
But, this isn't used to alert the homeowner to a reparable problem.
Rather, you get a "big bill" and start looking to see "Why?"
 Our city water contractor said on radio few days ago that they would start to deploy smart water meters, and he did say that they would try to detect leaks on our premises, and tell us.
They COULD do this.  But, don't.  They can only contact you by mail so any
notification would already be several days delayed (assuming they are
WATCHING for leaks continuously and not just "noticing" them when they
read the meter)
And, few customers are aware of the meters' capabilities.  I've told some
how to remove the iron grating covering the valve/meter (watching for
poisonous critters), lift the access panel covering the display and LOOK
for the "leak indicator" icon.
In addition to being able to see just what the flow rate is, then (i.e., do
so with no loads turned on and you can gauge the magnitude of your leak
before the next water bill arrives).
Our static water pressure is 100+ psi.  So, takes extra wear-and-tear on
appliances (typically rated for an 80 psi supply) and fittings.  Water
lines pass UNDER the slab, here, so you are also at the mercy of pipes
becoming corroded and you never know it.

Water here is scarce, the water company is trying to conserve it (a percent comes from desalinization plants).
Desalinization isn't YET practical, here.  But, water is scarce with only
11 inches of precipitation, annually.  And the municipalities all trying
to stoke their economies by new residential/commercial developments.
There are suburbs who have skirted the law requiring a 100 year water
supply before construction can be allowed.  (they do this by making tiny
"developments" that fall below the size requiring certification.
They have suddenly found themselves struggling to GET water as they
rely on the cooperation of other entities to supply them with water.
Bankers aren't keen on extending mortgages to folks who don't have
long term water supplies.  Penny saved...  <shrug>

I have seen a crew of two people (I think) open the iron lid that covers the main water valve on the street, at 3 AM, put a tool to it, and hear carefully the noise on headphones, to detect leaks; they were doing the same on all houses on the street. And then, days later, I noticed a crew coming in and opening up the pavement to repair a single leak.
Most leaks are "after the meter" (i.e., on the consumer's side).  So,
the city isn't responsible for those repairs.  It is up to the consumer
(homeowner) to get the repair fixed -- on their own dime.
For folks who can't do this kind of work, it can be several thousand
dollars to dig up the yard and lay new pipe.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Apr 25 * energy in UK175john larkin
13 Apr 25 +* Re: energy in UK172Bill Sloman
13 Apr 25 i+* Re: energy in UK3Liz Tuddenham
13 Apr 25 ii`* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25 ii `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i`* Re: energy in UK168Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK18Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i+* Re: energy in UK14Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: energy in UK13Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: energy in UK12Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: energy in UK11Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: energy in UK10Jim Jackson
14 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: energy in UK9Liz Tuddenham
15 Apr 25 i ii     `* Re: energy in UK8Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i ii      `* Re: energy in UK7Liz Tuddenham
16 Apr 25 i ii       `* Re: energy in UK6Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 i ii        `* Re: energy in UK5Cursitor Doom
18 Apr 25 i ii         +- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25 i ii         `* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
20 Apr 25 i ii          `* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
20 Apr 25 i ii           `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Cursitor Doom
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK7john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i`* Re: energy in UK6Jeroen Belleman
14 Apr 25 i i `* Re: energy in UK5john larkin
15 Apr 25 i i  `* Re: energy in UK4Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i   `* Re: energy in UK3john larkin
16 Apr 25 i i    `* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
16 Apr 25 i i     `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i `* Re: energy in UK140Don Y
15 Apr 25 i  `* Re: energy in UK139Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK96Don Y
16 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: energy in UK95Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: energy in UK94Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: energy in UK11KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i`* Re: energy in UK10Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i `* Re: energy in UK9KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  +* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i`* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  `* Re: energy in UK5Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i   `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i    `* Re: energy in UK3wmartin
18 Apr 25 i   i  i     `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i      `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: energy in UK82Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK76Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i`* Re: energy in UK75Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK39Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK38Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `* Re: energy in UK37Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  +* Re: energy in UK35Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i+* Re: energy in UK32Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii`* Re: energy in UK31Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii `* Re: energy in UK30Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  +* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i`* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  `* Re: energy in UK26KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii   `* Re: energy in UK25Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    +* Re: energy in UK20Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i+* Re: energy in UK18Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK17Carlos E.R.
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK16Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK15Carlos E.R.
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii   `* Re: energy in UK14Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    +* Re: energy in UK9Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i+* Re: energy in UK7Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK6Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK5Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  +* Re: energy in UK2Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  i`- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii   `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    `* Re: energy in UK4Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     +* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii     `* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii      `* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii       `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i`* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i `* Re: energy in UK32Carlos E.R.
17 Apr 25 i   i   i  `* Re: energy in UK31Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i   `* Re: energy in UK30Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i`* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i `* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i  `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK2john larkin
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    `* Re: energy in UK19Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2Theo
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i   `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK18john larkin
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
25 Apr 25 i   `* Re: energy in UK20Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 `* Re: energy in UK2john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal