Re: CAT5e cable

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: CAT5e cable
De : joegwinn (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Joe Gwinn)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 20. Apr 2025, 22:15:19
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <5hoa0kp3riorfa12jid1t3docptqn87arv@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 10:53:25 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

Les,
>
1)    The Durometer of the plastic coating on the wire and the sheath.
     Range is 0 -100 and the higher the number the harder the
     material.  I doubt that you will find that in the specs, but.
>
This (the "more desirable") seems to be *thicker* than the other.
The inferior product almost looks/feels like "shrink wrap over 4 pairs".
I.e., you can FEEL the pairs under the jacket.
>
The nicer (in terms of routing) cable has a more substantial
feel to it (though not as if the jacket was a *tube* with loose
conductors within).
>
2)    CCA  Copper Coated or Clad Aluminum  I was always careful
     when buying CAT-5 or CAT-6 cable.  Always wanted Solid Copper!
     Look for that on the cable box or on the cable itself.
>
Yes.  I am also wondering if stranded would have been a better
choice (too late now) despite being "premises wiring" (not
patch cables).
>
3)    Cable Gauge. 22 AWG vs 24 AWG vs 26 AWG vs 28 AWG  The higher
     the number the thinner the wire.
>
I've always used #24AWG.
>
Hope that help with your challenge!!
>
My concern is mainly to know how to specify the type of cable
that should be used in future installations (in which I won't
likely be involved).  Other than naming a specific vendor
and model number (whose manufacture could also change, over
time)
>
Both (all?) cables seem electrically similar and have the same
stated pull strength.  But, I noticed feeding several cables
through the EMT, conduit bodies, els, etc. there was a definite
difference in how the "flimsier" one handled the bends that
you encounter in those situations.
>
As I suspect "paid help" would be less meticulous than I, it
would be wise to specify materials that they would be less
likely to abuse.  <frown>

The simplest way I know of is to get samples and cut them open for
detail inspection.

Without destructive inspection, there are a few tests.   First, mass
per length - heavier is better.  Second is DC resistance of each
conductor per length - smaller is better.  For shielded twisted pair,
the shield quality can be measured, but this requires special tools.

Joe Gwinn

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Apr 25 * CAT5e cable13Don Y
20 Apr 25 +* Re: CAT5e cable6Don Y
20 Apr 25 i`* Re: CAT5e cable5Joe Gwinn
20 Apr 25 i +- Re: CAT5e cable1john larkin
20 Apr 25 i `* Re: CAT5e cable3Don Y
21 Apr 25 i  `* Re: CAT5e cable2Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   `- Re: CAT5e cable1Don Y
21 Apr 25 `* Re: CAT5e cable6Jeff Liebermann
21 Apr 25  +- Re: CAT5e cable1Don Y
8 May 25  `* Re: CAT5e cable4David Lesher
8 May 25   +- Re: CAT5e cable1Don Y
8 May 25   `* Re: CAT5e cable2Jeff Liebermann
8 May 25    `- Re: CAT5e cable1Jeff Liebermann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal