Sujet : Re: CAT5e cable
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 21. Apr 2025, 02:02:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vu45eu$103jp$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 4/20/2025 5:41 PM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 15:56:08 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
As I suspect "paid help" would be less meticulous than I, it
would be wise to specify materials that they would be less
likely to abuse. <frown>
>
The simplest way I know of is to get samples and cut them open for
detail inspection.
>
That only works for the samples you have in your hands.
I don't see any criteria that is *specified* for the
cables that highlights the differences that I am seeing.
True. You can specify such things, but dream on - the vendors won't
notice of care.
But a purchasing agent (or manufacturing engineer) can use the criteria
to decide to accept or reject a potential candidate. And, it would alert
installers to the issues that they could encounter before they'd run
thousands of feet of cable. E.g., *I* was lazy enough to NOT replace those
drops.
The only things you can specify are the overall system-driven
requirements like max attenuation versus frequency and distance,
shielding effectiveness, and the like.
And buying sight unseen is almost guaranteed to end in tears.
Sadly, I hadn't considered this aspect of their construction when
I purchased each box. As most of the runs are interior, this
was my first experience with this issue.