Re: energy in UK

Liste des GroupesRevenir à se design 
Sujet : Re: energy in UK
De : blockedofcourse (at) *nospam* foo.invalid (Don Y)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 22. Apr 2025, 01:11:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vu6msf$3a6iq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
On 4/21/2025 4:53 PM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:54:43 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
 
On 4/21/2025 9:48 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
The 5-to-1 is installation only, but it's hard for decreased
maintenance and repair to make enough difference to tilt the balance.
>
Hmmm, I would have thought damage from storms (branches falling on
overhead lines), "accidents" (drivers skidding in snow; drunks)
and the inevitable "road widening" operations would be very costly.
 When the business folk do the analysis, if the payback time is longer
than two or three years, it simply isn't worth the investment, so
isn't done.
That's likely the case.  "Let the next guy deal with those costs in
HIS budget...".  Individuals and corporations tend to think in different
terms (though many individuals are similarly short-sighted)

It varies.  In the last house that my parents had built (in the 1960s
if I recall) had an immense boulder (with a spring) in one corner of
the basement.  They considered having it removed, which could only be
done by blasting.  While this was easily done safely, it proved far
too expensive, so the boulder remained, with its own drainage system
leading to the sea.
I recall large car-sized boulders sitting on the surface (favorites
for young kids to play on/around).  But, note that any time I had
to dig, in the yard, it was just annoying "stones" that would impede my
shovel's progress.
[I also learned, at an early age, to shovel stone with a pitchfork,
not a shovel!]

A house that my then widowed father bought many years later also had a
granite ledge under one part of the first floor, so the basement was a
third the size one would expect.
 
Here, we are plagued with /caliche/ making digging very difficult
(probably one of the reasons that basements are eschewed in favor
of slab construction).  Planting a tree requires renting a "jack
hammer" with shovel attachment to get through the caliche.  And,
digging a hole as large as you expect the root system of the
tree to become as the caliche is so impermeable.
>
[E.g., I dug 4 ft diameter holes to a depth of 4 feet for each of
the citrus trees.  The soil removed from the holes was *discarded*
and replaced with fresh topsoil.  As the arborist said, "you are
basically excavating a FLOWER POT for your tree; consider how large
a pot it will need as it matures".]
>
After excavation (for utilities), the lines have to be shaded with
sand and other fine materials to prevent "stones" from impinging
on the cables as the ground shifts (subsidence from groundwater
pumping).
>
Yet, this is the norm for new developments.  Hard to imagine it would
be mandated solely for aesthetics...
 Thankfully, in New England we don't have such problems.
We had clay -- but clay is relatively easy to cut/extract as a
shovel edge will penetrate it.   (We had "clay pits" where
brick businesses had extracted the clay to make bricks and
left the holes to fill with water -- which they dutifully
retained due to their high clay content.)

Closest was New Jersey, where our back yard was hard-pan clay - it
took a pickaxe to dig that stuff up.  Which I did, precisely to make a
flower bed.
Colorado suffers from a relative abundance of bentonite.
It is a type of clay that retains moisture and swells,
considerably (~20% by volume) -- and similarly contracts
as it dries.
Building, there, *requires* a geological survey of the property
to assess the extent of its occurrence on the plot.  It
can easily fracture foundation walls, cause roads to heave,
break sewer/pipe-lines, etc.
[If you've ever seen images of the pronounced "cracks" in such
soil as a result of drought, you can understand how those layers
had more volume when wet than they now have, dry.]
Electing to build in the presence of such soils requires different
building designs to accommodate that expansion [and contraction]

The original US example of burying all services is Columbia Maryland,
which was created from cornfields as a big development, so it was
practical to install the services using very large vibrating-blade
plows before anything else was built.
 Maryland is mostly mud around there.  Very fertile soil.
 Joe

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Apr 25 * energy in UK175john larkin
13 Apr 25 +* Re: energy in UK172Bill Sloman
13 Apr 25 i+* Re: energy in UK3Liz Tuddenham
13 Apr 25 ii`* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
13 Apr 25 ii `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i`* Re: energy in UK168Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK18Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i+* Re: energy in UK14Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: energy in UK13Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: energy in UK12Martin Brown
14 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: energy in UK11Liz Tuddenham
14 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: energy in UK10Jim Jackson
14 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: energy in UK9Liz Tuddenham
15 Apr 25 i ii     `* Re: energy in UK8Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i ii      `* Re: energy in UK7Liz Tuddenham
16 Apr 25 i ii       `* Re: energy in UK6Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 i ii        `* Re: energy in UK5Cursitor Doom
18 Apr 25 i ii         +- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
19 Apr 25 i ii         `* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
20 Apr 25 i ii          `* Re: energy in UK2Cursitor Doom
20 Apr 25 i ii           `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
14 Apr 25 i i+- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Cursitor Doom
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK7john larkin
14 Apr 25 i i`* Re: energy in UK6Jeroen Belleman
14 Apr 25 i i `* Re: energy in UK5john larkin
15 Apr 25 i i  `* Re: energy in UK4Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i   `* Re: energy in UK3john larkin
16 Apr 25 i i    `* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
16 Apr 25 i i     `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
14 Apr 25 i +* Re: energy in UK2Jeroen Belleman
15 Apr 25 i i`- Re: energy in UK1Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i `* Re: energy in UK140Don Y
15 Apr 25 i  `* Re: energy in UK139Martin Brown
15 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK96Don Y
16 Apr 25 i   i`* Re: energy in UK95Martin Brown
16 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: energy in UK94Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: energy in UK11KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i`* Re: energy in UK10Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i `* Re: energy in UK9KevinJ93
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  +* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i`* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  i  `* Re: energy in UK5Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i   `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i  i    `* Re: energy in UK3wmartin
18 Apr 25 i   i  i     `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i  i      `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i  `* Re: energy in UK82Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK76Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i`* Re: energy in UK75Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK39Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK38Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `* Re: energy in UK37Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  +* Re: energy in UK35Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i+* Re: energy in UK32Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii`* Re: energy in UK31Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii `* Re: energy in UK30Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  +* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i`* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  i `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii  `* Re: energy in UK26KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii   `* Re: energy in UK25Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    +* Re: energy in UK20Carlos E.R.
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i+* Re: energy in UK18Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK17Carlos E.R.
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK16Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK15Carlos E.R.
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii   `* Re: energy in UK14Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    +* Re: energy in UK9Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i+* Re: energy in UK7Don Y
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii`* Re: energy in UK6Joe Gwinn
21 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii `* Re: energy in UK5Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  +* Re: energy in UK2Joe Gwinn
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  i`- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii  `* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    ii   `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii    `* Re: energy in UK4Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     +* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     i`- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
22 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    ii     `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    i`- Re: energy in UK1KevinJ93
19 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii    `* Re: energy in UK4KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii     `* Re: energy in UK3Don Y
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii      `* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
20 Apr 25 i   i   i i  ii       `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i`* Re: energy in UK2Carlos E.R.
24 Apr 25 i   i   i i  i `- Re: energy in UK1Don Y
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i  `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i +* Re: energy in UK3Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i`* Re: energy in UK2Liz Tuddenham
17 Apr 25 i   i   i i `- Re: energy in UK1john larkin
17 Apr 25 i   i   i `* Re: energy in UK32Carlos E.R.
17 Apr 25 i   i   i  `* Re: energy in UK31Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i   `* Re: energy in UK30Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i`* Re: energy in UK3Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i `* Re: energy in UK2Don Y
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    i  `- Re: energy in UK1Carlos E.R.
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK2john larkin
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
18 Apr 25 i   i   i    `* Re: energy in UK19Martin Brown
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2Theo
17 Apr 25 i   i   +* Re: energy in UK2KevinJ93
18 Apr 25 i   i   `- Re: energy in UK1Bill Sloman
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK18john larkin
16 Apr 25 i   +* Re: energy in UK4Liz Tuddenham
25 Apr 25 i   `* Re: energy in UK20Martin Brown
18 Apr 25 `* Re: energy in UK2john larkin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal