Sujet : Re: Cap C-V test
De : jl (at) *nospam* glen--canyon.com (john larkin)
Groupes : sci.electronics.designDate : 01. May 2025, 22:13:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <dpo71k97paal675b2iog4vh2kpqap4mipk@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 1 May 2025 22:36:11 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 5/1/25 22:09, john larkin wrote:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/a7425c69k3w8wx8tqjpq5/X110_CV_Test.jpg?rlkey=pc3c0b12ncswv6ajrn148stdk&raw=1
The DUT is a Venkel 2.2 uF 100v 1812-size ceramic cap. I need to run
it at 48 volts. 0.8 uF is probably OK. I have room on my board so I
guess I'll add another cap in parallel.
My AADE cap meter was behaving strangely here, so I measured C by
noting the -3 dB frequency driving the cap from a 50 ohm sine wave
generator.
>
I used an old Rohde & Schwarz KARU capacitance meter to match
capacitors. It was really good at that, but sometimes it just
wouldn't work. At some point, I decided to finally figure out
why. It turned out the KARU applied over 300Vpp of AC at tens
of kHz to my little capacitors.
>
Oh.
>
Jeroen Belleman
300v will radically change the value of a ceramic cap.
The fungen+scope can tell you a lot more about a cap than the single
number reported by a c-meter (that you maybe can't trust anyhow.)