Liste des Groupes | Revenir à se design |
On 5/3/25 20:30, john larkin wrote:<snip>On Sat, 3 May 2025 19:23:11 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>On 5/3/25 17:12, john larkin wrote:On Sat, 3 May 2025 14:24:07 +0200, "Carlos E.R."
<robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>On 2025-05-02 12:03, Martin Brown wrote:On 01/05/2025 18:41, Bill Sloman wrote:On 2/05/2025 2:21 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>On 30/04/2025 7:59 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
The contributions of wind and solar don't have to be oblivious of demand - wind turbines can be feathered and photovoltaic cells can be run at higher voltages and lower currents than would give maximum power transfer.>With the contribution of solar and wind being oblivious of demand,
Most run at the MPPT point, so have no reserve to save the grid. And a
lot of cloud cover or still wind will precipitate the very crisis that
needs reserve.
the burden of keeping the grid stable must be taken up by thermal
or hydro power plants.
When Spain's grid crashed, PV amounted toIt make me wonder why they didn't have any grid scale scale storage.
well over 50% of the total supply. It makes me wonder why it didn't
crash sooner.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.